Financhill
Buy
53

CAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$4.13
Seasonality move :
-2.25%
Day range:
$4.01 - $4.15
52-week range:
$3.34 - $5.37
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
4.32x
P/S ratio:
0.18x
P/B ratio:
0.35x
Volume:
10.8K
Avg. volume:
25.6K
1-year change:
13.08%
Market cap:
$125.2M
Revenue:
$650.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.96

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
-- -- -- -- --
CVGI
Commercial Vehicle Group
$163.5M -$0.15 -29.7% -40% $4.00
DORM
Dorman Products
$483.1M $1.46 2.82% 17.48% $144.75
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
$1.1M -- -100% -- --
MNRO
Monro
$289.5M $0.03 -6.93% -79.17% $18.33
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
$190.7M $0.20 0.65% 566.67% $14.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
$4.15 -- $125.2M 4.32x $0.80 0% 0.18x
CVGI
Commercial Vehicle Group
$1.39 $4.00 $48.1M 1.77x $0.00 0% 0.06x
DORM
Dorman Products
$127.57 $144.75 $3.9B 18.30x $0.00 0% 1.92x
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
$1.14 -- $199.8M -- $0.00 0% 124.74x
MNRO
Monro
$12.77 $18.33 $382.5M 19.95x $0.28 8.77% 0.33x
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
$11.34 $14.00 $222.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.30x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
31.26% 0.507 94.17% 0.88x
CVGI
Commercial Vehicle Group
46.21% 0.865 302.99% 1.01x
DORM
Dorman Products
25.65% 1.999 12.54% 1.17x
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
-- 5.202 -- 13.33x
MNRO
Monro
8.37% 1.018 7.98% 0.05x
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
32.62% 1.578 85.45% 0.34x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
$28.6M $8.6M 5.28% 7.32% 7.52% $7.8M
CVGI
Commercial Vehicle Group
$17.8M $1.4M -11.9% -22.04% 0.87% $11.4M
DORM
Dorman Products
$207.7M $80.1M 12.16% 17.2% 16.04% $40.3M
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
$12K -$18.3M -- -- -3742.13% -$21.3M
MNRO
Monro
$104.8M $10M 2.67% 3.03% 3.26% $7.9M
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
$44.9M $20M -4.09% -6.4% 9.58% $33.7M

China Automotive Systems vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CAAS or CVGI?

    Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 4.26% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of -2.54%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    17.11% $0.24 $561.7M
    CVGI
    Commercial Vehicle Group
    10.48% -$0.12 $254.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CAAS or CVGI?

    China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 187.77%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0 0 0
    CVGI
    Commercial Vehicle Group
    1 0 0
  • Is CAAS or CVGI More Risky?

    China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.831%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAAS or CVGI?

    China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAAS or CVGI?

    China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $167.1M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.32x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.18x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0.18x 4.32x $167.1M $7.1M
    CVGI
    Commercial Vehicle Group
    0.06x 1.77x $169.8M -$4.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAAS or DORM?

    Dorman Products has a net margin of 4.26% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 11.33%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    17.11% $0.24 $561.7M
    DORM
    Dorman Products
    40.91% $1.87 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CAAS or DORM?

    China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.47%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Dorman Products.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0 0 0
    DORM
    Dorman Products
    0 1 0
  • Is CAAS or DORM More Risky?

    China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.306%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAAS or DORM?

    China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAAS or DORM?

    China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $167.1M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.32x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 18.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.18x versus 1.92x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0.18x 4.32x $167.1M $7.1M
    DORM
    Dorman Products
    1.92x 18.30x $507.7M $57.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAAS or HYLN?

    Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.26% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of -3528.43%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    17.11% $0.24 $561.7M
    HYLN
    Hyliion Holdings
    2.45% -$0.10 $228M
  • What do Analysts Say About CAAS or HYLN?

    China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.44%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0 0 0
    HYLN
    Hyliion Holdings
    0 1 0
  • Is CAAS or HYLN More Risky?

    China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAAS or HYLN?

    China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAAS or HYLN?

    China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $167.1M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.32x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.18x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0.18x 4.32x $167.1M $7.1M
    HYLN
    Hyliion Holdings
    124.74x -- $489K -$17.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAAS or MNRO?

    Monro has a net margin of 4.26% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 1.5%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32% beat Monro's return on equity of 3.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    17.11% $0.24 $561.7M
    MNRO
    Monro
    34.28% $0.15 $708.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CAAS or MNRO?

    China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.57%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Monro.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0 0 0
    MNRO
    Monro
    1 4 0
  • Is CAAS or MNRO More Risky?

    China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.745%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAAS or MNRO?

    China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 8.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAAS or MNRO?

    China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $167.1M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $305.8M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M is higher than Monro's net income of $4.6M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.32x while Monro's PE ratio is 19.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.18x versus 0.33x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0.18x 4.32x $167.1M $7.1M
    MNRO
    Monro
    0.33x 19.95x $305.8M $4.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAAS or MPAA?

    Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 4.26% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 1.23%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    17.11% $0.24 $561.7M
    MPAA
    Motorcar Parts of America
    24.11% $0.11 $389.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About CAAS or MPAA?

    China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.46%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0 0 0
    MPAA
    Motorcar Parts of America
    1 0 0
  • Is CAAS or MPAA More Risky?

    China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.368%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAAS or MPAA?

    China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAAS or MPAA?

    China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $167.1M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $186.2M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.32x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.18x versus 0.30x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0.18x 4.32x $167.1M $7.1M
    MPAA
    Motorcar Parts of America
    0.30x -- $186.2M $2.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?
Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?

Shares of EV major Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) have experienced extreme volatility…

Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?

For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…

Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?

You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28

Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is up 1.57% over the past day.

Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28

ATS [ATS] is down 1.27% over the past day.

Buy
88
SMR alert for May 28

NuScale Power [SMR] is down 0.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock