GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of -10.69%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.04 which suggests that it could grow by 31.88%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.47x versus 0.20x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 191.67%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.47x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 2.01%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat Worthington Steel's return on equity of 9.63%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Worthington Steel has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.63%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Worthington Steel.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Worthington Steel offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel pays out 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Worthington Steel's is not.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are smaller than Worthington Steel quarterly revenues of $687.4M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than Worthington Steel's net income of $13.8M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Worthington Steel's PE ratio is 12.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.47x versus 0.43x for Worthington Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -21.64% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -4.81% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 158.62%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $307.2M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$66.5M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.47x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.