GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Johnson Matthey PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Johnson Matthey PLC's return on equity of 22.37%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 157.14%. On the other hand Johnson Matthey PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Johnson Matthey PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Johnson Matthey PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Matthey PLC has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.45%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Johnson Matthey PLC offers a yield of 5.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Matthey PLC pays out 130.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Johnson Matthey PLC's is not.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Johnson Matthey PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Johnson Matthey PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.00x while Johnson Matthey PLC's PE ratio is 0.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.40x versus 0.21x for Johnson Matthey PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 2.28%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 8.17%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 157.14%. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $69.72 which suggests that it could grow by 19.57%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than LyondellBasell Industries NV, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than LyondellBasell Industries NV.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.092%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 9.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 126.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but LyondellBasell Industries NV's is not.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is lower than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of $175M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.00x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 17.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.40x versus 0.50x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Anglo American PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Anglo American PLC's return on equity of -10.11%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 157.14%. On the other hand Anglo American PLC has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Anglo American PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Anglo American PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Anglo American PLC has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.607%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Anglo American PLC offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Anglo American PLC pays out -33.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Anglo American PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Anglo American PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.00x while Anglo American PLC's PE ratio is 148.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.40x versus 1.23x for Anglo American PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 20.21%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 157.14%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $79.02 which suggests that it could grow by 34.96%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Rio Tinto PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Rio Tinto PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.002%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 60.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.00x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.40x versus 1.78x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.