Financhill
Buy
69

GDYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$16.80
Seasonality move :
10.32%
Day range:
$16.51 - $17.03
52-week range:
$9.07 - $25.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
420.50x
P/S ratio:
3.86x
P/B ratio:
2.72x
Volume:
736.9K
Avg. volume:
842.3K
1-year change:
36.75%
Market cap:
$1.4B
Revenue:
$350.6M
EPS (TTM):
$0.04

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
$101.9M $0.10 23.02% 148.45% $26.00
CTM
Castellum
-- -- -- -- --
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
$882.2M $0.74 -5.52% 46.53% $70.00
EXOD
Exodus Movement
$34.1M $0.31 27.94% -77.91% $54.00
MRT
Marti Technologies
-- -- -- -- $3.00
VRSN
VeriSign
$405.2M $2.17 4.2% 9.31% $230.28
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
$16.82 $26.00 $1.4B 420.50x $0.00 0% 3.86x
CTM
Castellum
$1.18 -- $94.9M -- $0.00 0% 1.49x
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
$42.64 $70.00 $1.6B 356.62x $0.00 0% 0.43x
EXOD
Exodus Movement
$28.05 $54.00 $802.2M 8.04x $0.00 0% 7.27x
MRT
Marti Technologies
$3.26 $3.00 $191M -- $0.00 0% 9.69x
VRSN
VeriSign
$238.35 $230.28 $22.5B 29.79x $0.00 0% 15.03x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
-- 1.111 -- 7.27x
CTM
Castellum
34.01% -35.855 6.75% 1.81x
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
49.94% 1.699 57.05% 0.71x
EXOD
Exodus Movement
-- 2.900 -- 9.11x
MRT
Marti Technologies
-- -1.298 -- 0.73x
VRSN
VeriSign
-1082.31% 0.437 9.12% 0.40x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
$37M $1.3M 0.98% 0.98% 1.26% $4.4M
CTM
Castellum
$4.1M -$1.6M -40.39% -71.22% -30.39% -$394.4K
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
$231.6M $42.5M -0.78% -1.61% 4.17% $186.2M
EXOD
Exodus Movement
$32.8M $18.9M 59.94% 59.94% 41% -$5.1M
MRT
Marti Technologies
-- -- -- -- -- --
VRSN
VeriSign
$347M $263.8M 6062.5% -- 67.5% $222M

Grid Dynamics Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or CTM?

    Castellum has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of -26.62%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    CTM
    Castellum
    40% -$0.05 $30.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or CTM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.58%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.54%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Castellum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    CTM
    Castellum
    0 0 0
  • Is GDYN or CTM More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 438.042%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or CTM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or CTM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 420.50x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.86x versus 1.49x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.86x 420.50x $100.3M $4.5M
    CTM
    Castellum
    1.49x -- $10.3M -$2.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or DBD?

    Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 0.57%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    DBD
    Diebold Nixdorf
    23.42% $0.15 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or DBD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.58%. On the other hand Diebold Nixdorf has an analysts' consensus of $70.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.17%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    DBD
    Diebold Nixdorf
    2 0 0
  • Is GDYN or DBD More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or DBD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diebold Nixdorf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diebold Nixdorf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or DBD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are smaller than Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues of $988.9M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is lower than Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 420.50x while Diebold Nixdorf's PE ratio is 356.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.86x versus 0.43x for Diebold Nixdorf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.86x 420.50x $100.3M $4.5M
    DBD
    Diebold Nixdorf
    0.43x 356.62x $988.9M $5.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or EXOD?

    Exodus Movement has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 4.19%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    EXOD
    Exodus Movement
    71.26% $2.08 $257.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or EXOD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.58%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 92.51%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    EXOD
    Exodus Movement
    2 0 0
  • Is GDYN or EXOD More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or EXOD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or EXOD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 420.50x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 8.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.86x versus 7.27x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.86x 420.50x $100.3M $4.5M
    EXOD
    Exodus Movement
    7.27x 8.04x $46M $66.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or MRT?

    Marti Technologies has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of --. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    MRT
    Marti Technologies
    -- -- -$51.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or MRT?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.58%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.98%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    MRT
    Marti Technologies
    0 1 0
  • Is GDYN or MRT More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or MRT?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or MRT?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 420.50x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.86x versus 9.69x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.86x 420.50x $100.3M $4.5M
    MRT
    Marti Technologies
    9.69x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or VRSN?

    VeriSign has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 48.43%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat VeriSign's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    VRSN
    VeriSign
    87.76% $2.00 -$165.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or VRSN?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.58%. On the other hand VeriSign has an analysts' consensus of $230.28 which suggests that it could fall by -3.39%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than VeriSign.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    VRSN
    VeriSign
    2 1 0
  • Is GDYN or VRSN More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VeriSign has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.974%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or VRSN?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VeriSign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VeriSign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or VRSN?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are smaller than VeriSign quarterly revenues of $395.4M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is lower than VeriSign's net income of $191.5M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 420.50x while VeriSign's PE ratio is 29.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.86x versus 15.03x for VeriSign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.86x 420.50x $100.3M $4.5M
    VRSN
    VeriSign
    15.03x 29.79x $395.4M $191.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?

There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…

Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?
Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?

When the Federal Reserve started hiking rates in 2022, banks’…

Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?
Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) share price has been on the proverbial ropes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
59
GRRR alert for Mar 15

Gorilla Technology Group [GRRR] is up 29.72% over the past day.

Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 15

Semtech [SMTC] is up 21.28% over the past day.

Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 15

Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 17.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock