ESQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 35.59% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 4.33%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 20.07% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Esquire Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Esquire Financial Holdings is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.548%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Esquire Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $31.9M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 5.52x versus 1.23x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 35.59% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 16.32%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 20.07% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $31.9M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 5.52x versus 2.92x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 35.59% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 27.77%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 20.07% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Park National offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $31.9M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 5.52x versus 5.75x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 35.59% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 24.66%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 20.07% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.93%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.702% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Esquire Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $31.9M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 5.52x versus 3.41x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.