CSTE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kornit Digital has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -1.79%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -21.29% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -5.27%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.16%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Kornit Digital, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Kornit Digital.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 82.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.446%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $107.6M, which are larger than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Caesarstone's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Kornit Digital's net income of -$908K. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.32x versus 7.64x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of --. Caesarstone's return on equity of -21.29% beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1442.53%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than Caesarstone, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than Caesarstone.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 82.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $107.6M, which are larger than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. Caesarstone's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.32x versus -- for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of --. Caesarstone's return on equity of -21.29% beat SuperCom's return on equity of --.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 248.84%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than Caesarstone, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Caesarstone.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 82.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.195%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $107.6M, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of --. Caesarstone's net income of -$4.2M is higher than SuperCom's net income of --. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SuperCom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.32x versus 0.11x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of 7.08%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -21.29% beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.56%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than Caesarstone, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than Caesarstone.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 82.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.403%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $107.6M, which are larger than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $40.5M. Caesarstone's net income of -$4.2M is lower than TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 35.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.32x versus 1.86x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.