CLMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 11.45%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.98%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $212.01 which suggests that it could grow by 13.1%. Given that Climb Global Solutions has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.467%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 107.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.95x versus 14.96x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 5.06%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.46%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.98%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.89%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $498.1M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is lower than ePlus's net income of $25.2M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.95x versus 0.91x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 15.63%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.98%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.38%. Given that Climb Global Solutions has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions is more attractive than Red Violet.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.95x versus 8.87x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of -40.61%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.98%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 96.76%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.95x versus 0.22x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.