CCOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a net margin of -24.54% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -18.1%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of 8.6% beat Consolidated Communications Holdings's return on equity of -25.13%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.5%. On the other hand Consolidated Communications Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.35 which suggests that it could fall by -7.84%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Consolidated Communications Holdings, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Consolidated Communications Holdings.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.514%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Consolidated Communications Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays 14.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Communications Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $257.2M, which are smaller than Consolidated Communications Holdings quarterly revenues of $271.1M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$63.1M is lower than Consolidated Communications Holdings's net income of -$49.1M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.14x while Consolidated Communications Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 3.42x versus 0.49x for Consolidated Communications Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDT has a net margin of -24.54% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of 5.57%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of 8.6% beat IDT's return on equity of 30.08%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.5%. On the other hand IDT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -84.87%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than IDT, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than IDT.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDT has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.878%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. IDT offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays 14.27% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT pays out 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $257.2M, which are smaller than IDT quarterly revenues of $309.6M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$63.1M is lower than IDT's net income of $17.2M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.14x while IDT's PE ratio is 16.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 3.42x versus 1.00x for IDT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of -24.54% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -4.6%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of 8.6% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -270.39%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.5%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.27 which suggests that it could fall by -4.04%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.756%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays 14.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -0.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $257.2M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$63.1M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$148M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.14x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 3.42x versus 0.41x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ribbon Communications has a net margin of -24.54% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -6.38%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of 8.6% beat Ribbon Communications's return on equity of -12.61%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.5%. On the other hand Ribbon Communications has an analysts' consensus of $5.90 which suggests that it could grow by 43.9%. Given that Ribbon Communications has higher upside potential than Cogent Communications Holdings, analysts believe Ribbon Communications is more attractive than Cogent Communications Holdings.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ribbon Communications has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.476%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Ribbon Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays 14.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Ribbon Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $257.2M, which are larger than Ribbon Communications quarterly revenues of $210.2M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$63.1M is lower than Ribbon Communications's net income of -$13.4M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.14x while Ribbon Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 3.42x versus 0.88x for Ribbon Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.