ATEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cable One has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of -27.18%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat Cable One's return on equity of 0.77%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 138.94%. On the other hand Cable One has an analysts' consensus of $395.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.15%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than Cable One, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than Cable One.

Anterix has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cable One has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.942%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cable One offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.95 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cable One pays out 468.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Cable One quarterly revenues of $387.2M. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is higher than Cable One's net income of -$105.2M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while Cable One's PE ratio is 133.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 106.31x versus 0.97x for Cable One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of -17.17%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -49.24%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 138.94%. On the other hand Cogent Communications Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.27 which suggests that it could grow by 42.78%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than Cogent Communications Holdings, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than Cogent Communications Holdings.

Anterix has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.612%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cogent Communications Holdings offers a yield of 6.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings pays out -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues of $252.3M. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is higher than Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$43.3M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while Cogent Communications Holdings's PE ratio is 92.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 106.31x versus 2.62x for Cogent Communications Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDT has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of 6.68%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat IDT's return on equity of 30.53%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 138.94%. On the other hand IDT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.78%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than IDT, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than IDT.

Anterix has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDT has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.286%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IDT offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDT pays out 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than IDT quarterly revenues of $303.3M. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is lower than IDT's net income of $20.3M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while IDT's PE ratio is 15.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 106.31x versus 1.02x for IDT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of 2.55%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -12.54%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 138.94%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.05 which suggests that it could grow by 54.28%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Anterix has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.802%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is lower than Lumen Technologies's net income of $85M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 106.31x versus 0.25x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.