CASY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Etsy has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 15.24%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $426.70, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $58.75 which suggests that it could grow by 28.71%. Given that Etsy has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Etsy is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 2.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.82%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Etsy quarterly revenues of $852.2M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Etsy's net income of $129.9M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Etsy's PE ratio is 19.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 0.95x versus 2.14x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leslies has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of -25.43%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Leslies's return on equity of --.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $426.70, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Leslies has an analysts' consensus of $2.30 which suggests that it could grow by 178.96%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Leslies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Leslies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Leslies quarterly revenues of $175.2M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Leslies's net income of -$44.6M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Leslies's PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 0.95x versus 0.11x for Leslies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 1.62%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.53%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $426.70, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 488.92%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.958%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 15.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Natural Health Trends's net income of $176K. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 80.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 0.95x versus 1.36x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 6.27%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 49.44%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $426.70, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $58.18 which suggests that it could grow by 12.24%. Given that Tractor Supply has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Tractor Supply is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.874, which suggesting that the stock is 12.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.287%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $236.4M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 0.95x versus 1.88x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.