BSRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 29.25% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 31.58%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.25, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.7%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than Sierra Bancorp, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than Sierra Bancorp.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 39.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $36.2M, which are smaller than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $10.6M is lower than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 3.35x versus 3.06x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Central Pacific Financial has a net margin of 29.25% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 20.37%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.25, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Central Pacific Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.19%. Given that Sierra Bancorp has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe Sierra Bancorp is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.679%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Central Pacific Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 39.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial pays out 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $36.2M, which are smaller than Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues of $65.3M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $10.6M is lower than Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Central Pacific Financial's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 3.35x versus 3.14x for Central Pacific Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Horizon has a net margin of 29.25% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 27.18%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 10.73% beat First Horizon's return on equity of 8.71%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.25, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand First Horizon has an analysts' consensus of $21.80 which suggests that it could grow by 7.97%. Given that Sierra Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Horizon, analysts believe Sierra Bancorp is more attractive than First Horizon.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Horizon has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.539%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. First Horizon offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 39.36% of its earnings as a dividend. First Horizon pays out 40.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $36.2M, which are smaller than First Horizon quarterly revenues of $802M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $10.6M is lower than First Horizon's net income of $218M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while First Horizon's PE ratio is 14.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 3.35x versus 3.51x for First Horizon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandy Spring Bancorp has a net margin of 29.25% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 16.03%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Sandy Spring Bancorp's return on equity of 5.38%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.25, signalling upside risk potential of 14.58%. On the other hand Sandy Spring Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.6%. Given that Sierra Bancorp has higher upside potential than Sandy Spring Bancorp, analysts believe Sierra Bancorp is more attractive than Sandy Spring Bancorp.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandy Spring Bancorp has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.443%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Sandy Spring Bancorp offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 39.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandy Spring Bancorp pays out 49.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $36.2M, which are smaller than Sandy Spring Bancorp quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $10.6M is lower than Sandy Spring Bancorp's net income of $16.2M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Sandy Spring Bancorp's PE ratio is 17.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 3.35x versus 3.86x for Sandy Spring Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.