BIGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 18.49%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.79%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $321.21 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Autodesk.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 58.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.21x versus 10.55x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 11.89%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.79%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $697.18 which suggests that it could grow by 5.42%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Intuit.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.835%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.21x versus 10.92x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 36.86%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.79%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.32 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Microsoft.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.21x versus 12.57x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 4.25%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.79%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $299.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.86%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Workday.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.683%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is lower than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 140.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.21x versus 8.76x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.