BAER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -82.42% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 1.38%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -38.66% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.28%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 273.13%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $34.82 which suggests that it could fall by -3.9%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.016%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $283.1M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$12.8M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 329.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.81x versus 4.86x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of -82.42% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -7.88%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -38.66% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -6.14%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 273.13%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.73%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.455%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $223.1M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$12.8M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.6M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.81x versus 3.32x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of -82.42% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -658%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -38.66% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 273.13%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.938%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 8.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$12.8M is lower than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.81x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Senstar Technologies has a net margin of -82.42% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 13.25%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -38.66% beat Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 273.13%. On the other hand Senstar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.737%.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senstar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are larger than Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$12.8M is lower than Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Senstar Technologies's PE ratio is 27.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.81x versus 2.16x for Senstar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.