Financhill
Sell
30

BAER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.31
Seasonality move :
-2.51%
Day range:
$1.22 - $1.45
52-week range:
$1.02 - $4.49
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.74x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
574.1K
Avg. volume:
167.8K
1-year change:
-66.92%
Market cap:
$72.3M
Revenue:
$98.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.79

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
$6M -- 3.73% -- $5.00
CXW
CoreCivic
$478.5M $0.13 1.82% 29.41% $31.25
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
$292.3M $0.09 1.86% 86.66% $37.09
MRCY
Mercury Systems
$204.2M $0.07 -1.61% -94.66% $46.25
NTIP
Network-1 Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
SNT
Senstar Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
$1.32 $5.00 $72.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.74x
CXW
CoreCivic
$22.11 $31.25 $2.4B 29.09x $0.00 0% 1.26x
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
$36.01 $37.09 $5.5B 277.00x $0.00 0% 4.84x
MRCY
Mercury Systems
$47.20 $46.25 $2.8B -- $0.00 0% 3.11x
NTIP
Network-1 Technologies
$1.25 -- $28.6M -- $0.05 8% --
SNT
Senstar Technologies
$3.74 -- $87.2M 31.17x $0.00 0% 2.44x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
83.83% 1.301 45.49% 1.54x
CXW
CoreCivic
39.99% 1.655 44.31% 1.34x
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
11.04% 1.416 3.78% 2.05x
MRCY
Mercury Systems
28.96% 1.202 23.32% 2.17x
NTIP
Network-1 Technologies
-- 0.290 -- 41.52x
SNT
Senstar Technologies
-- 5.577 -- 2.99x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
-$1.6M -$10.2M -4.45% -25.77% -61.05% -$21.2M
CXW
CoreCivic
$113.9M $47.4M 3.4% 5.76% 9.69% $18.4M
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
$73.6M $6.6M 1.28% 1.45% 2.08% -$51.8M
MRCY
Mercury Systems
$57.1M -$12.1M -3.16% -4.45% -6.51% $24.1M
NTIP
Network-1 Technologies
$108K -$645K -5.43% -5.43% -430% -$255K
SNT
Senstar Technologies
$6.6M $1.8M 4% 4% 18.8% --

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BAER or CXW?

    CoreCivic has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 5.14%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    -9.98% -$0.41 $243.5M
    CXW
    CoreCivic
    23.31% $0.23 $2.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About BAER or CXW?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 278.79%. On the other hand CoreCivic has an analysts' consensus of $31.25 which suggests that it could grow by 41.34%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than CoreCivic, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than CoreCivic.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    1 0 0
    CXW
    CoreCivic
    4 0 0
  • Is BAER or CXW More Risky?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreCivic has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.352%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAER or CXW?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreCivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic pays out 0.2% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BAER or CXW?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than CoreCivic quarterly revenues of $488.6M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than CoreCivic's net income of $25.1M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreCivic's PE ratio is 29.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.74x versus 1.26x for CoreCivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    0.74x -- $15.6M -$15.5M
    CXW
    CoreCivic
    1.26x 29.09x $488.6M $25.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns BAER or KTOS?

    Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 1.49%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    -9.98% -$0.41 $243.5M
    KTOS
    Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
    24.32% $0.03 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About BAER or KTOS?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 278.79%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $37.09 which suggests that it could grow by 3%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    1 0 0
    KTOS
    Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
    6 4 0
  • Is BAER or KTOS More Risky?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.016%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAER or KTOS?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BAER or KTOS?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 277.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.74x versus 4.84x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    0.74x -- $15.6M -$15.5M
    KTOS
    Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
    4.84x 277.00x $302.6M $4.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns BAER or MRCY?

    Mercury Systems has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -9.07%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    -9.98% -$0.41 $243.5M
    MRCY
    Mercury Systems
    27.02% -$0.33 $2B
  • What do Analysts Say About BAER or MRCY?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 278.79%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $46.25 which suggests that it could fall by -2.01%. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    1 0 0
    MRCY
    Mercury Systems
    3 3 0
  • Is BAER or MRCY More Risky?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.455%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAER or MRCY?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BAER or MRCY?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $211.4M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.74x versus 3.11x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    0.74x -- $15.6M -$15.5M
    MRCY
    Mercury Systems
    3.11x -- $211.4M -$19.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns BAER or NTIP?

    Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of -242%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -5.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    -9.98% -$0.41 $243.5M
    NTIP
    Network-1 Technologies
    72% -$0.02 $42.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About BAER or NTIP?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 278.79%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    1 0 0
    NTIP
    Network-1 Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is BAER or NTIP More Risky?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.938%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAER or NTIP?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BAER or NTIP?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $150K. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$363K. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.74x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    0.74x -- $15.6M -$15.5M
    NTIP
    Network-1 Technologies
    -- -- $150K -$363K
  • Which has Higher Returns BAER or SNT?

    Senstar Technologies has a net margin of -99.31% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net margin of 13.25%. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's return on equity of -25.77% beat Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    -9.98% -$0.41 $243.5M
    SNT
    Senstar Technologies
    67.95% $0.06 $37.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About BAER or SNT?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 278.79%. On the other hand Senstar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    1 0 0
    SNT
    Senstar Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is BAER or SNT More Risky?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.737%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAER or SNT?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senstar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BAER or SNT?

    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.6M, which are larger than Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Senstar Technologies's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Senstar Technologies's PE ratio is 31.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings is 0.74x versus 2.44x for Senstar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BAER
    Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings
    0.74x -- $15.6M -$15.5M
    SNT
    Senstar Technologies
    2.44x 31.17x $9.7M $1.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Gartner Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Gartner Stock Be in 5 Years?

If you’ve ever wondered what it’s like to invest in…

Rambus (RMBS) Stock Forecast, Can the Rally Continue in 2025?
Rambus (RMBS) Stock Forecast, Can the Rally Continue in 2025?

Rambus has flown under the radar, but the numbers tell…

Celsius Stock Forecast: Will Earnings Spark Another Surge?
Celsius Stock Forecast: Will Earnings Spark Another Surge?

Energy drink seller Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH) has reported somewhat…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x

Sell
33
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Buy
60
MRUS alert for May 24

Merus NV [MRUS] is up 32.55% over the past day.

Buy
57
RGC alert for May 24

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.43% over the past day.

Buy
90
OKLO alert for May 24

Oklo [OKLO] is up 23.11% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock