AIHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of -61.46% compared to Senmiao Technology's net margin of 9.99%. Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86%.

Senmiao Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $147.60 which suggests that it could grow by 10.37%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than Senmiao Technology.

Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.466%.

Senmiao Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Senmiao Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues are $919.8K, which are smaller than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $836.4M. Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K is lower than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M. Notably, Senmiao Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 21.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology is 1.46x versus 1.78x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of -61.46% compared to Senmiao Technology's net margin of -3.85%. Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -7.14%.

Senmiao Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Senmiao Technology has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe Senmiao Technology is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.95%.

Senmiao Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senmiao Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues are $919.8K, which are smaller than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K is lower than Old Market Capital's net income of -$124K. Notably, Senmiao Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology is 1.46x versus 9.46x for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of -61.46% compared to Senmiao Technology's net margin of 52.42%. Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72% beat SLM's return on equity of 28.08%.

Senmiao Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.15%. Given that SLM has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology, analysts believe SLM is more attractive than Senmiao Technology.

Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.92%.

Senmiao Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLM offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Senmiao Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 19.31% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues are $919.8K, which are smaller than SLM quarterly revenues of $581M. Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K is lower than SLM's net income of $304.5M. Notably, Senmiao Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SLM's PE ratio is 10.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology is 1.46x versus 3.35x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

World Acceptance has a net margin of -61.46% compared to Senmiao Technology's net margin of 28.74%. Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72% beat World Acceptance's return on equity of 21.05%.

Senmiao Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand World Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of $138.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.06%. Given that World Acceptance has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology, analysts believe World Acceptance is more attractive than Senmiao Technology.

Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison World Acceptance has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.831%.

Senmiao Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. World Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senmiao Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. World Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues are $919.8K, which are smaller than World Acceptance quarterly revenues of $154.1M. Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K is lower than World Acceptance's net income of $44.3M. Notably, Senmiao Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while World Acceptance's PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology is 1.46x versus 1.36x for World Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.