FCFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Old Market Capital has a net margin of 9.99% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of -3.85%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -7.14%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of $147.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.22%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.635, which suggesting that the stock is 36.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.82%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $836.4M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.2M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M is higher than Old Market Capital's net income of -$124K. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.78x versus 9.38x for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of 9.99% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of 52.42%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86% beat SLM's return on equity of 28.08%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of $147.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.22%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.8%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than SLM.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.635, which suggesting that the stock is 36.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.92%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. SLM offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 19.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $836.4M, which are larger than SLM quarterly revenues of $581M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M is lower than SLM's net income of $304.5M. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while SLM's PE ratio is 11.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.78x versus 3.62x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upstart Holdings has a net margin of 9.99% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of -1.3%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86% beat Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -20.93%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of $147.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.22%. On the other hand Upstart Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $73.92 which suggests that it could grow by 47.61%. Given that Upstart Holdings has higher upside potential than FirstCash Holdings, analysts believe Upstart Holdings is more attractive than FirstCash Holdings.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.635, which suggesting that the stock is 36.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Upstart Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Upstart Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $836.4M, which are larger than Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues of $211.3M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M is higher than Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Upstart Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.78x versus 7.12x for Upstart Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

World Acceptance has a net margin of 9.99% compared to FirstCash Holdings's net margin of 28.74%. FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86% beat World Acceptance's return on equity of 21.05%.

FirstCash Holdings has a consensus price target of $147.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.22%. On the other hand World Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of $138.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.74%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than World Acceptance, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than World Acceptance.

FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.635, which suggesting that the stock is 36.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison World Acceptance has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.803%.

FirstCash Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. World Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FirstCash Holdings pays 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. World Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues are $836.4M, which are larger than World Acceptance quarterly revenues of $154.1M. FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M is higher than World Acceptance's net income of $44.3M. Notably, FirstCash Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while World Acceptance's PE ratio is 8.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FirstCash Holdings is 1.78x versus 1.40x for World Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.