UHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Health Systems has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of -2.14%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 17.56% beat Community Health Systems's return on equity of --.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $228.65, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Community Health Systems has an analysts' consensus of $4.16 which suggests that it could grow by 59.28%. Given that Community Health Systems has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Community Health Systems is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Health Systems has a beta of 1.717, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.715%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Community Health Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Health Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Community Health Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Universal Health Services's net income of $332.4M is higher than Community Health Systems's net income of -$70M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Community Health Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.79x versus 0.03x for Community Health Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCA Healthcare has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 7.86%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 17.56% beat HCA Healthcare's return on equity of 574.85%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $228.65, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand HCA Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of $374.89 which suggests that it could grow by 10.74%. Given that Universal Health Services has higher upside potential than HCA Healthcare, analysts believe Universal Health Services is more attractive than HCA Healthcare.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCA Healthcare has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.328%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. HCA Healthcare offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. HCA Healthcare pays out 11.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than HCA Healthcare quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Universal Health Services's net income of $332.4M is lower than HCA Healthcare's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while HCA Healthcare's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.79x versus 1.26x for HCA Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Select Medical Holdings has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 13.09%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 17.56% beat Select Medical Holdings's return on equity of 11.54%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $228.65, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Select Medical Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.80 which suggests that it could grow by 34.2%. Given that Select Medical Holdings has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Select Medical Holdings is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Select Medical Holdings has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.57%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Select Medical Holdings offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Select Medical Holdings pays out 30.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Select Medical Holdings quarterly revenues of -$122.6M. Universal Health Services's net income of $332.4M is higher than Select Medical Holdings's net income of -$16.1M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Select Medical Holdings's PE ratio is 10.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.79x versus 0.41x for Select Medical Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenet Healthcare has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 6.27%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 17.56% beat Tenet Healthcare's return on equity of 42.47%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $228.65, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Tenet Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of $171.37 which suggests that it could grow by 30.75%. Given that Tenet Healthcare has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Tenet Healthcare is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenet Healthcare has a beta of 1.773, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.276%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Tenet Healthcare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Tenet Healthcare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Tenet Healthcare quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Universal Health Services's net income of $332.4M is higher than Tenet Healthcare's net income of $318M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Tenet Healthcare's PE ratio is 4.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.79x versus 0.62x for Tenet Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.