TROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Resources has a net margin of 24.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 7.27%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29% beat Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.57%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $107.54, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand Franklin Resources has an analysts' consensus of $20.59 which suggests that it could grow by 14.71%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.941%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Franklin Resources offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources pays out 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Franklin Resources quarterly revenues of $2.3B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M is higher than Franklin Resources's net income of $163.6M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.41x while Franklin Resources's PE ratio is 27.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.71x versus 1.06x for Franklin Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackstone has a net margin of 24.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 26.04%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 14.74%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $107.54, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $181.40 which suggests that it could grow by 36.29%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.056%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.7B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $703.9M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.41x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 36.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.71x versus 9.34x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 24.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of -94.79%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $107.54, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.04 which suggests that it could grow by 96.28%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 509.761%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.41x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 8.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.71x versus 5.31x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 24.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 19.05%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $107.54, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.08 which suggests that it could grow by 11.04%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.403%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $4.8B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.41x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.71x versus 1.15x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.