SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 6.47%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $21.69 which suggests that it could fall by -0.74%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.232%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.71x versus 0.86x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -201.42%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.96%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2033.33%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.476%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $282K. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$568K. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is 273.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.71x versus 88.75x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.85%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.21%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.54%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.179%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $126.2M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 68.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.71x versus 2.05x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of --. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7381.3%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.361%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.71x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.