SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 3.72%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $91.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.81%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $21.31 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.414%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. Kennametal offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.58x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.60x versus 0.76x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southwest Airlines has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -2.32%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Southwest Airlines's return on equity of 5.38%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $91.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.81%. On the other hand Southwest Airlines has an analysts' consensus of $28.7123 which suggests that it could grow by 5.33%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Southwest Airlines, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Southwest Airlines.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southwest Airlines has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.661%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. Southwest Airlines offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Southwest Airlines pays out 92.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Southwest Airlines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Southwest Airlines quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Southwest Airlines's net income of -$149M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.58x while Southwest Airlines's PE ratio is 32.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.60x versus 0.61x for Southwest Airlines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -0.33%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $91.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.81%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.2%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.383%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.58x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 54.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.60x versus 1.78x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Airlines Holdings has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.93%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat United Airlines Holdings's return on equity of 32.41%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $91.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.81%. On the other hand United Airlines Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $91.93 which suggests that it could grow by 33.36%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than United Airlines Holdings, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than United Airlines Holdings.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Airlines Holdings has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.455%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. United Airlines Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. United Airlines Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than United Airlines Holdings quarterly revenues of $13.2B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is lower than United Airlines Holdings's net income of $387M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.58x while United Airlines Holdings's PE ratio is 6.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.60x versus 0.40x for United Airlines Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.