SEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of -0.53% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 19.52%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 41.44% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $40.66, signalling upside risk potential of 36.12%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,636.98 which suggests that it could grow by 23.53%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.234%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.60 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Sealed Air's net income of -$7.3M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.50x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 26.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.81x versus 6.55x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of -0.53% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 9.39%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 41.44% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $40.66, signalling upside risk potential of 36.12%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $212.69 which suggests that it could grow by 27.85%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.749%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Sealed Air's net income of -$7.3M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.50x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 18.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.81x versus 1.65x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of -0.53% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of -16.86%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 41.44% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $40.66, signalling upside risk potential of 36.12%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 50.47%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Sealed Air, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Sealed Air.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 212.238%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Sealed Air's net income of -$7.3M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.50x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.81x versus 0.88x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of -0.53% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 0.24%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 41.44% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 0.56%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $40.66, signalling upside risk potential of 36.12%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $17.81 which suggests that it could grow by 28.65%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.32%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.68%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $411M. Sealed Air's net income of -$7.3M is lower than Tripadvisor's net income of $1M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.50x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 692.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.81x versus 1.08x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.