RRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coterra Energy has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 21.29%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat Coterra Energy's return on equity of 8.58%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $41.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand Coterra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $34.98 which suggests that it could grow by 39.26%. Given that Coterra Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Coterra Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.107%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Coterra Energy offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy pays out 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than Coterra Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than Coterra Energy's net income of $297M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.41x while Coterra Energy's PE ratio is 16.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.46x versus 3.44x for Coterra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 21.93%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.31%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $41.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $73.53 which suggests that it could grow by 91.58%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 2.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.1%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $978.3M. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $214.5M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.41x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.46x versus 1.37x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 22.53%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $41.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $47.27 which suggests that it could grow by 112.34%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.41x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.46x versus 0.96x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 9.39%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $41.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $128.71 which suggests that it could grow by 23.36%. Given that Range Resources has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Range Resources is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.41x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.46x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.