3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
When the market entered a correction in February and March,…
Buy
63
RF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.58
Seasonality move
:
0.72%
Day range:
$21.14 - $21.85
52-week range:
$17.72 - $27.96
Dividend yield:
4.56%
P/E ratio:
11.20x
P/S ratio:
2.82x
P/B ratio:
1.22x
Volume:
9.1M
Avg. volume:
9.3M
1-year change:
3.28%
Market cap:
$19.7B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RF
Regions Financial
|
$1.8B | $0.51 | 5.31% | 37.37% | $26.60 |
|
BAC
Bank of America
|
$27B | $0.82 | 4.45% | 7.99% | $52.17 |
|
C
Citigroup
|
$21.4B | $1.93 | 1.23% | 22.04% | $90.34 |
|
JPM
JPMorgan Chase &
|
$43.8B | $4.59 | 4.32% | 2.86% | $265.02 |
|
TFC
Truist Financial
|
$5B | $0.88 | 3.37% | 8.3% | $49.96 |
|
WFC
Wells Fargo &
|
$20.8B | $1.23 | -0.41% | 2.46% | $83.05 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RF
Regions Financial
|
$21.73 | $26.60 | $19.7B | 11.20x | $0.25 | 4.56% | 2.82x |
|
BAC
Bank of America
|
$41.73 | $52.17 | $317.3B | 12.96x | $0.26 | 2.44% | 3.25x |
|
C
Citigroup
|
$70.99 | $90.34 | $133.6B | 11.93x | $0.56 | 3.11% | 1.69x |
|
JPM
JPMorgan Chase &
|
$245.30 | $265.02 | $685.9B | 12.43x | $1.25 | 1.96% | 4.17x |
|
TFC
Truist Financial
|
$41.15 | $49.96 | $53.7B | 12.36x | $0.52 | 5.06% | 4.15x |
|
WFC
Wells Fargo &
|
$71.79 | $83.05 | $236.1B | 13.34x | $0.40 | 2.16% | 3.03x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RF
Regions Financial
|
26.64% | 1.723 | 28.09% | 69.45x |
|
BAC
Bank of America
|
52.5% | 1.388 | 91.34% | 1.97x |
|
C
Citigroup
|
61.68% | 1.337 | 222.76% | 1.48x |
|
JPM
JPMorgan Chase &
|
56.86% | 1.309 | 65.78% | 1.45x |
|
TFC
Truist Financial
|
45.23% | 1.555 | 83.49% | 2.11x |
|
WFC
Wells Fargo &
|
51.03% | 1.111 | 74.19% | 3.73x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RF
Regions Financial
|
-- | -- | 8.25% | 10.71% | 67.71% | -$229M |
|
BAC
Bank of America
|
-- | -- | 4.33% | 9.22% | 113.33% | $25.9B |
|
C
Citigroup
|
-- | -- | 2.37% | 6.09% | 128.24% | $23.1B |
|
JPM
JPMorgan Chase &
|
-- | -- | 7.44% | 17.24% | 97.2% | $147.8B |
|
TFC
Truist Financial
|
-- | -- | 4.05% | 7.73% | 81.88% | $775M |
|
WFC
Wells Fargo &
|
-- | -- | 5.14% | 10.79% | 76.56% | $8.9B |
Regions Financial vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RF or BAC?
Bank of America has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 26.3%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Bank of America's return on equity of 9.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RFRegions Financial-- $0.56 $24.4B BACBank of America-- $0.82 $622.2B -
What do Analysts Say About RF or BAC?
Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Bank of America has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 25.01%. Given that Bank of America has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Bank of America is more attractive than Regions Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RFRegions Financial7 11 0 BACBank of America12 3 0 -
Is RF or BAC More Risky?
Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of America has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.45%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or BAC?
Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Bank of America offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of America pays out 35.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or BAC?
Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Bank of America quarterly revenues of $25.3B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Bank of America's net income of $6.7B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Bank of America's PE ratio is 12.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.82x versus 3.25x for Bank of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RFRegions Financial2.82x 11.20x $1.8B $534M BACBank of America3.25x 12.96x $25.3B $6.7B
-
Which has Higher Returns RF or C?
Citigroup has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 14.58%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Citigroup's return on equity of 6.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RFRegions Financial-- $0.56 $24.4B CCitigroup-- $1.34 $545.2B -
What do Analysts Say About RF or C?
Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Citigroup has an analysts' consensus of $90.34 which suggests that it could grow by 27.26%. Given that Citigroup has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Citigroup is more attractive than Regions Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RFRegions Financial7 11 0 CCitigroup9 5 0 -
Is RF or C More Risky?
Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citigroup has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.912%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or C?
Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Citigroup offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Citigroup pays out 41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or C?
Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Citigroup quarterly revenues of $19.6B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Citigroup's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Citigroup's PE ratio is 11.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.82x versus 1.69x for Citigroup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RFRegions Financial2.82x 11.20x $1.8B $534M CCitigroup1.69x 11.93x $19.6B $2.9B
-
Which has Higher Returns RF or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 32.73%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat JPMorgan Chase &'s return on equity of 17.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RFRegions Financial-- $0.56 $24.4B JPMJPMorgan Chase &-- $4.81 $799.1B -
What do Analysts Say About RF or JPM?
Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand JPMorgan Chase & has an analysts' consensus of $265.02 which suggests that it could grow by 8.04%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Chase &, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than JPMorgan Chase &.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RFRegions Financial7 11 0 JPMJPMorgan Chase &7 8 0 -
Is RF or JPM More Risky?
Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Chase & has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.712%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or JPM?
Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. JPMorgan Chase & offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Chase & pays out 25.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or JPM?
Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than JPMorgan Chase & quarterly revenues of $42.8B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than JPMorgan Chase &'s net income of $14B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while JPMorgan Chase &'s PE ratio is 12.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.82x versus 4.17x for JPMorgan Chase &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RFRegions Financial2.82x 11.20x $1.8B $534M JPMJPMorgan Chase &4.17x 12.43x $42.8B $14B
-
Which has Higher Returns RF or TFC?
Truist Financial has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 25.22%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Truist Financial's return on equity of 7.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RFRegions Financial-- $0.56 $24.4B TFCTruist Financial-- $0.91 $116.3B -
What do Analysts Say About RF or TFC?
Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Truist Financial has an analysts' consensus of $49.96 which suggests that it could grow by 21.41%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Truist Financial, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Truist Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RFRegions Financial7 11 0 TFCTruist Financial7 11 0 -
Is RF or TFC More Risky?
Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.862%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or TFC?
Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Truist Financial offers a yield of 5.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial pays out 65.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or TFC?
Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Truist Financial quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Truist Financial's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Truist Financial's PE ratio is 12.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.82x versus 4.15x for Truist Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RFRegions Financial2.82x 11.20x $1.8B $534M TFCTruist Financial4.15x 12.36x $5.1B $1.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns RF or WFC?
Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 24.92%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RFRegions Financial-- $0.56 $24.4B WFCWells Fargo &-- $1.43 $367.7B -
What do Analysts Say About RF or WFC?
Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $83.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Wells Fargo &, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Wells Fargo &.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RFRegions Financial7 11 0 WFCWells Fargo &9 7 0 -
Is RF or WFC More Risky?
Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.021%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or WFC?
Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or WFC?
Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $5.1B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.82x versus 3.03x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RFRegions Financial2.82x 11.20x $1.8B $534M WFCWells Fargo &3.03x 13.34x $20.4B $5.1B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How High Could IBIT Go?
Recently, a surprising number of billionaire hedge fund managers have…
Is Raymond James Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Raymond James Financial (NYSE:RJF) is one of America’s large financial…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
41
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
80
CORT alert for Apr 1
Corcept Therapeutics [CORT] is down 19.56% over the past day.
Sell
16
PCVX alert for Apr 1
Vaxcyte [PCVX] is down 14.62% over the past day.
Buy
74
COOP alert for Apr 1
Mr. Cooper Group [COOP] is up 4.63% over the past day.
