PVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyzon Motors has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of -30835.08%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Hyzon Motors's return on equity of -186.9%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $102.93, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Hyzon Motors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12401.95%. Given that Hyzon Motors has higher upside potential than PVH, analysts believe Hyzon Motors is more attractive than PVH.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyzon Motors has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Hyzon Motors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyzon Motors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Hyzon Motors quarterly revenues of $134K. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Hyzon Motors's net income of -$41.3M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Hyzon Motors's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.43x versus 0.30x for Hyzon Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of -169.41%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $102.93, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.55 which suggests that it could grow by 10.11%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Lucid Group.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.43x versus 7.02x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of -42.85%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $102.93, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 27.24%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.43x versus 2.35x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of 9.17%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $102.93, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $323.87 which suggests that it could grow by 21.17%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Tesla.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Tesla's PE ratio is 131.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.43x versus 9.57x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.