PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oshkosh has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 4.85%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.05%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $105.11 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.861%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.3B. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.49x versus 0.57x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -0.7%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.05%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 69.96%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.927, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.705%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $204.6M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is 912.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.49x versus 0.40x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 60.63%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -18.83%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.05%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.89%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.608%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Wabash National offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $380.9M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Wabash National's net income of $230.9M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.49x versus 0.20x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -66.57%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.05%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 64.93%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.49x versus 0.51x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.