MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 11.87%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.56 which suggests that it could grow by 20%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.853%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 6.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.85x versus 1.25x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of --. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.656%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.85x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 0.13%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $86.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 27.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.85x versus 0.55x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 2.13%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $17.25 which suggests that it could grow by 40.7%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.322%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $352.1M. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is higher than Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 38.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.85x versus 0.74x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.