IFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -35.81% compared to International Flavors & Fragrances's net margin of -1.23%. International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of -5.92% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $91.61, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Flavors & Fragrances has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.38%.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. International Flavors & Fragrances pays 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Flavors & Fragrances's is not.

International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$1B is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, International Flavors & Fragrances's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.26x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Flavors & Fragrances is 1.69x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of -35.81% compared to International Flavors & Fragrances's net margin of -12.12%. International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of -5.92% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81%.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $91.61, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $8.63 which suggests that it could grow by 104.87%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than International Flavors & Fragrances, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than International Flavors & Fragrances.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.693%.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Flavors & Fragrances pays 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $601.5M. International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$1B is lower than Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M. Notably, International Flavors & Fragrances's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.26x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Flavors & Fragrances is 1.69x versus 0.11x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -35.81% compared to International Flavors & Fragrances's net margin of --. International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of -5.92% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $91.61, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 185.71%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than International Flavors & Fragrances, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than International Flavors & Fragrances.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Flavors & Fragrances pays 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$1B is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, International Flavors & Fragrances's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.26x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Flavors & Fragrances is 1.69x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -35.81% compared to International Flavors & Fragrances's net margin of --. International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of -5.92% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $91.61, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.5%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than International Flavors & Fragrances, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than International Flavors & Fragrances.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Flavors & Fragrances pays 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$1B is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, International Flavors & Fragrances's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.26x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Flavors & Fragrances is 1.69x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.