FRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 7.56%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.97% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 10.13%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $116.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.81%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $18.75 which suggests that it could grow by 37.97%. Given that Host Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than Federal Realty Investment Trust, analysts believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.195%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 6.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 125.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 105.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $65.5M is lower than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $108M. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 13.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 6.43x versus 1.68x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 58.11%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.97% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.44%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $116.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.81%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $123.15 which suggests that it could grow by 25.05%. Given that Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more attractive than Prologis.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.608%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 125.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Federal Realty Investment Trust's is not.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $65.5M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while Prologis's PE ratio is 24.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 6.43x versus 11.45x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 42.22%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.97% beat Simon Property Group's return on equity of 66.01%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $116.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.81%. On the other hand Simon Property Group has an analysts' consensus of $188.08 which suggests that it could grow by 25.92%. Given that Simon Property Group has higher upside potential than Federal Realty Investment Trust, analysts believe Simon Property Group is more attractive than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.348%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. Simon Property Group offers a yield of 5.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 125.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $65.5M is lower than Simon Property Group's net income of $668.1M. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while Simon Property Group's PE ratio is 20.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 6.43x versus 8.17x for Simon Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 5.41%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.97% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.21%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $116.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.81%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $165.05 which suggests that it could grow by 12.6%. Given that Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more attractive than Welltower.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.829%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 125.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $65.5M is lower than Welltower's net income of $120M. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.91x while Welltower's PE ratio is 93.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 6.43x versus 11.36x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.