FFIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 12.96%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.56%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.39%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $86.55 which suggests that it could grow by 11.48%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.856%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. F5's net income of $145.5M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $663M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 16.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.32x versus 1.92x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynatrace has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 82.94%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Dynatrace's return on equity of 22.55%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.39%. On the other hand Dynatrace has an analysts' consensus of $61.38 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that Dynatrace has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Dynatrace is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynatrace has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.292%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynatrace offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynatrace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than Dynatrace quarterly revenues of $436.2M. F5's net income of $145.5M is lower than Dynatrace's net income of $361.8M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while Dynatrace's PE ratio is 29.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.32x versus 8.75x for Dynatrace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 8.28%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.39%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $216.30 which suggests that it could grow by 37%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.57%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 20.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.32x versus 1.94x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GitLab has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 2.75%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat GitLab's return on equity of -0.9%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.39%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $72.11 which suggests that it could grow by 55.12%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than GitLab quarterly revenues of $211.4M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than GitLab's net income of $5.8M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while GitLab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.32x versus 10.03x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.