FFIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dynatrace has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 8.83%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Dynatrace's return on equity of 21.21%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.74%. On the other hand Dynatrace has an analysts' consensus of $63.65 which suggests that it could grow by 19.48%. Given that Dynatrace has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Dynatrace is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynatrace has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.292%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynatrace offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynatrace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than Dynatrace quarterly revenues of $445.2M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than Dynatrace's net income of $39.3M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.76x while Dynatrace's PE ratio is 33.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.66x versus 9.50x for Dynatrace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GitLab has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 2.75%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat GitLab's return on equity of -0.9%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.74%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $71.69 which suggests that it could grow by 50.92%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than GitLab quarterly revenues of $211.4M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than GitLab's net income of $5.8M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.76x while GitLab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.66x versus 10.24x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -748.63%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -74.79%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.74%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $11.79 which suggests that it could grow by 23.02%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $29.1M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of $129.9M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.76x while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.66x versus 34.71x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -1.19%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.74%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $243.87 which suggests that it could fall by -4.03%. Given that F5 has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe F5 is more attractive than Zscaler.

F5 has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.534%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $647.9M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.76x while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.66x versus 16.05x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.