EXR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Digital Realty Trust has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Extra Space Storage's net margin of 13.2%. Extra Space Storage's return on equity of 5.65% beat Digital Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.72%.

Extra Space Storage has a consensus price target of $164.94, signalling upside risk potential of 14.42%. On the other hand Digital Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $189.13 which suggests that it could grow by 34.05%. Given that Digital Realty Trust has higher upside potential than Extra Space Storage, analysts believe Digital Realty Trust is more attractive than Extra Space Storage.

Extra Space Storage has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Realty Trust has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.973%.

Extra Space Storage has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Digital Realty Trust offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Extra Space Storage pays 160.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Realty Trust pays out 271.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Extra Space Storage quarterly revenues are $821.9M, which are smaller than Digital Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Extra Space Storage's net income of $262.5M is higher than Digital Realty Trust's net income of $189.6M. Notably, Extra Space Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while Digital Realty Trust's PE ratio is 87.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Extra Space Storage is 9.56x versus 8.42x for Digital Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Highwoods Properties has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Extra Space Storage's net margin of -1.51%. Extra Space Storage's return on equity of 5.65% beat Highwoods Properties's return on equity of 4.16%.

Extra Space Storage has a consensus price target of $164.94, signalling upside risk potential of 14.42%. On the other hand Highwoods Properties has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.07%. Given that Extra Space Storage has higher upside potential than Highwoods Properties, analysts believe Extra Space Storage is more attractive than Highwoods Properties.

Extra Space Storage has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highwoods Properties has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.428%.

Extra Space Storage has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Highwoods Properties offers a yield of 7.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Extra Space Storage pays 160.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Highwoods Properties pays out 210.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Extra Space Storage quarterly revenues are $821.9M, which are larger than Highwoods Properties quarterly revenues of $205.5M. Extra Space Storage's net income of $262.5M is higher than Highwoods Properties's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Extra Space Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while Highwoods Properties's PE ratio is 29.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Extra Space Storage is 9.56x versus 3.66x for Highwoods Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Extra Space Storage's net margin of 7.56%. Extra Space Storage's return on equity of 5.65% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 10.13%.

Extra Space Storage has a consensus price target of $164.94, signalling upside risk potential of 14.42%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 46.62%. Given that Host Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than Extra Space Storage, analysts believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than Extra Space Storage.

Extra Space Storage has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.195%.

Extra Space Storage has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 6.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Extra Space Storage pays 160.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 105.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Extra Space Storage quarterly revenues are $821.9M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Extra Space Storage's net income of $262.5M is higher than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $108M. Notably, Extra Space Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 13.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Extra Space Storage is 9.56x versus 1.65x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Extra Space Storage's net margin of 42.22%. Extra Space Storage's return on equity of 5.65% beat Simon Property Group's return on equity of 66.01%.

Extra Space Storage has a consensus price target of $164.94, signalling upside risk potential of 14.42%. On the other hand Simon Property Group has an analysts' consensus of $190.89 which suggests that it could grow by 24.62%. Given that Simon Property Group has higher upside potential than Extra Space Storage, analysts believe Simon Property Group is more attractive than Extra Space Storage.

Extra Space Storage has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.348%.

Extra Space Storage has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Simon Property Group offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. Extra Space Storage pays 160.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Extra Space Storage quarterly revenues are $821.9M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Extra Space Storage's net income of $262.5M is lower than Simon Property Group's net income of $668.1M. Notably, Extra Space Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while Simon Property Group's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Extra Space Storage is 9.56x versus 8.38x for Simon Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.