EQT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of 14.51%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 21.75%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $55.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.48%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.067%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. EQT's net income of $418.4M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $639M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 126.85x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.02x versus 1.13x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of -19.96%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -6%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $55.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.35 which suggests that it could grow by 19.3%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2B. EQT's net income of $418.4M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$399M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 126.85x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.02x versus 3.94x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of -1.88%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $55.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $51.52 which suggests that it could grow by 36.3%. Given that Occidental Petroleum has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Occidental Petroleum is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. EQT's net income of $418.4M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 126.85x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 15.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.02x versus 1.37x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of 63.71%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.85%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $55.68, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Texas Pacific Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.47%. Given that EQT has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe EQT is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.445, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.495%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Texas Pacific Land offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Pacific Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues of $185.8M. EQT's net income of $418.4M is higher than Texas Pacific Land's net income of $118.4M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 126.85x while Texas Pacific Land's PE ratio is 64.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.02x versus 41.23x for Texas Pacific Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.