ED Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CMS Energy has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 14.52%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.59%.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.19, signalling upside risk potential of 11.43%. On the other hand CMS Energy has an analysts' consensus of $71.95 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Consolidated Edison has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe Consolidated Edison is more attractive than CMS Energy.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CMS Energy has a beta of 0.423, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.75%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. CMS Energy offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. CMS Energy pays out 65.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than CMS Energy quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is higher than CMS Energy's net income of $253M. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while CMS Energy's PE ratio is 19.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.06x versus 2.63x for CMS Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearway Energy has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 7.41%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat Clearway Energy's return on equity of 2.38%.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.19, signalling upside risk potential of 11.43%. On the other hand Clearway Energy has an analysts' consensus of $33.58 which suggests that it could grow by 39.29%. Given that Clearway Energy has higher upside potential than Consolidated Edison, analysts believe Clearway Energy is more attractive than Consolidated Edison.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearway Energy has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.335%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Clearway Energy offers a yield of 6.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Clearway Energy pays out 393.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clearway Energy's is not.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Clearway Energy quarterly revenues of $486M. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is higher than Clearway Energy's net income of $36M. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Clearway Energy's PE ratio is 23.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.06x versus 2.09x for Clearway Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 30.27%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.19, signalling upside risk potential of 11.43%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $255.56 which suggests that it could grow by 18.54%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Consolidated Edison, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Consolidated Edison.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.06x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 30.03%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat Vistra's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.19, signalling upside risk potential of 11.43%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $161.46 which suggests that it could grow by 0.41%. Given that Consolidated Edison has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe Consolidated Edison is more attractive than Vistra.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.99%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is lower than Vistra's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Vistra's PE ratio is 30.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.06x versus 3.50x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.