EA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GameSquare Holdings has a net margin of 15.56% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -20.76%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 14.08% beat GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $147.10, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand GameSquare Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 381.77%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.734%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. GameSquare Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. GameSquare Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues of $26.4M. Electronic Arts's net income of $293M is higher than GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.12x while GameSquare Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 0.20x for GameSquare Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox has a net margin of 15.56% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -22.22%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 14.08% beat Roblox's return on equity of -742.69%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $147.10, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Roblox has an analysts' consensus of $68.30 which suggests that it could grow by 9.9%. Given that Roblox has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Roblox is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Roblox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Roblox quarterly revenues of $988.2M. Electronic Arts's net income of $293M is higher than Roblox's net income of -$219.6M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.12x while Roblox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 11.17x for Roblox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skillz has a net margin of 15.56% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -129.78%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 14.08% beat Skillz's return on equity of -24.55%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $147.10, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Skillz has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.31%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skillz has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Skillz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Skillz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Skillz quarterly revenues of $20.4M. Electronic Arts's net income of $293M is higher than Skillz's net income of -$26.4M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.12x while Skillz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 0.88x for Skillz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of 15.56% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -9.21%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 14.08% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -57.72%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $147.10, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $218.48 which suggests that it could grow by 4.05%. Given that Take-Two Interactive Software has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Take-Two Interactive Software is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.94799999999999%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Electronic Arts's net income of $293M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$125.2M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.12x while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 6.69x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.