DNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 3.23%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $260.22 which suggests that it could fall by -2.34%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 49.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 10.36x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 24.68%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $192.94 which suggests that it could grow by 9.47%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.526%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 36.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 8.33x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 32.48%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $502.40 which suggests that it could grow by 2.76%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than Moodys.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.353%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moodys's PE ratio is 42.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 12.31x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 28.86%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.61, signalling upside risk potential of 7.16%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $586.18 which suggests that it could grow by 12.2%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.865%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&P Global's PE ratio is 41.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.62x versus 11.19x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.