CLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 11.96%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 14.06%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $163.16, signalling upside risk potential of 9.74%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $106.96 which suggests that it could fall by -3.43%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Clorox has a beta of 0.612, which suggesting that the stock is 38.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.550, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.019%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Clorox's net income of $193M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of $189.2M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.63x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 46.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.59x versus 4.47x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 14.94%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $163.16, signalling upside risk potential of 9.74%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.95 which suggests that it could grow by 2.04%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Clorox has a beta of 0.612, which suggesting that the stock is 38.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.762%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.63x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 27.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.59x versus 3.93x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 21.16%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $163.16, signalling upside risk potential of 9.74%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.66 which suggests that it could grow by 3.64%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Clorox has a beta of 0.612, which suggesting that the stock is 38.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.63x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 27.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.59x versus 5.04x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 2.64%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $163.16, signalling upside risk potential of 9.74%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $67.27 which suggests that it could grow by 5.83%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Tyson Foods, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Tyson Foods.

Clorox has a beta of 0.612, which suggesting that the stock is 38.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.538%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Tyson Foods's net income of $359M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.63x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.59x versus 0.42x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.