CCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Crown Castle's net margin of 12.52%. Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44% beat Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.67%.

Crown Castle has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties has an analysts' consensus of $25.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.86%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties.

Crown Castle has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.155%.

Crown Castle has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. Healthpeak Properties offers a yield of 5.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Crown Castle pays 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 214.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Castle quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues of $686.1M. Crown Castle's net income of $303M is higher than Healthpeak Properties's net income of $85.9M. Notably, Crown Castle's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while Healthpeak Properties's PE ratio is 43.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Castle is 6.01x versus 5.11x for Healthpeak Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Crown Castle's net margin of 38.73%. Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Crown Castle has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $258.13 which suggests that it could grow by 26.53%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Crown Castle has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.079%.

Crown Castle has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Crown Castle pays 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Crown Castle's is not.

Crown Castle quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $667.6M. Crown Castle's net income of $303M is higher than SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M. Notably, Crown Castle's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 32.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Castle is 6.01x versus 8.29x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Crown Castle's net margin of 75.97%. Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44% beat VICI Properties's return on equity of 10.93%.

Crown Castle has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand VICI Properties has an analysts' consensus of $35.82 which suggests that it could grow by 23.23%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than VICI Properties.

Crown Castle has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.963%.

Crown Castle has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. VICI Properties offers a yield of 5.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Crown Castle pays 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties pays out 63.01% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Crown Castle's is not.

Crown Castle quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than VICI Properties quarterly revenues of $964.7M. Crown Castle's net income of $303M is lower than VICI Properties's net income of $732.9M. Notably, Crown Castle's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while VICI Properties's PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Castle is 6.01x versus 7.99x for VICI Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Crown Castle's net margin of 1.67%. Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44% beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 5.29%.

Crown Castle has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $36.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.44%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than Weyerhaeuser, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than Weyerhaeuser.

Crown Castle has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.678%.

Crown Castle has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Crown Castle pays 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 144.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Castle quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Crown Castle's net income of $303M is higher than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $28M. Notably, Crown Castle's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.32x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 38.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Castle is 6.01x versus 2.86x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.