WFAFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fitell has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 33.64% beat Fitell's return on equity of -110.03%.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fitell has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wesfarmers has higher upside potential than Fitell, analysts believe Wesfarmers is more attractive than Fitell.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fitell has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Fitell offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fitell pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fitell quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Fitell's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while Fitell's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.93x versus 1.77x for Fitell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harvey Norman Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 33.64% beat Harvey Norman Holdings's return on equity of 9.38%.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvey Norman Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wesfarmers has higher upside potential than Harvey Norman Holdings, analysts believe Wesfarmers is more attractive than Harvey Norman Holdings.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvey Norman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Harvey Norman Holdings offers a yield of 6.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvey Norman Holdings pays out 77.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvey Norman Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Harvey Norman Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while Harvey Norman Holdings's PE ratio is 11.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.93x versus 1.20x for Harvey Norman Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mixed Martial Arts Group has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 33.64% beat Mixed Martial Arts Group's return on equity of --.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mixed Martial Arts Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 746.78%. Given that Mixed Martial Arts Group has higher upside potential than Wesfarmers, analysts believe Mixed Martial Arts Group is more attractive than Wesfarmers.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mixed Martial Arts Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Mixed Martial Arts Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Mixed Martial Arts Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mixed Martial Arts Group quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Mixed Martial Arts Group's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while Mixed Martial Arts Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.93x versus -- for Mixed Martial Arts Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tabcorp Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 33.64% beat Tabcorp Holdings's return on equity of -46.28%.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tabcorp Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wesfarmers has higher upside potential than Tabcorp Holdings, analysts believe Wesfarmers is more attractive than Tabcorp Holdings.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tabcorp Holdings has a beta of -1.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 289.172%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Tabcorp Holdings offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Tabcorp Holdings pays out -3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tabcorp Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Tabcorp Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while Tabcorp Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.93x versus 0.57x for Tabcorp Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.