UNVGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koninklijke KPN NV has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of 16.51%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 51.03% beat Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koninklijke KPN NV has an analysts' consensus of $3.60 which suggests that it could fall by -0.28%. Given that Koninklijke KPN NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Koninklijke KPN NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.462, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.752%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Koninklijke KPN NV offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 73.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke KPN NV pays out 69.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.68x while Koninklijke KPN NV's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.71x versus 2.46x for Koninklijke KPN NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of -217.55%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 51.03% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -4.57%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.14%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.879%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 73.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $43.3M. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$94.2M. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.68x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.71x versus 1.04x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prosus NV has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of --. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 51.03% beat Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prosus NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal Music Group NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Universal Music Group NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prosus NV has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.609%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Prosus NV offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 73.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Prosus NV quarterly revenues of --. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than Prosus NV's net income of --. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.68x while Prosus NV's PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.71x versus 16.91x for Prosus NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Music Licensing has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of -343.42%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 51.03% beat Music Licensing's return on equity of -149.36%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Music Licensing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal Music Group NV has higher upside potential than Music Licensing, analysts believe Universal Music Group NV is more attractive than Music Licensing.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Music Licensing has a beta of 5.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 429.77%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Music Licensing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 73.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Music Licensing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Music Licensing quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than Music Licensing's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.68x while Music Licensing's PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.71x versus 0.00x for Music Licensing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.