TOGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of -18.26%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 262.32%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than TurnOnGreen, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than TurnOnGreen.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.763% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.375%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $14.5M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.28x versus 0.38x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Preformed Line Products has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of 6.25%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Preformed Line Products's return on equity of 8.84%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Preformed Line Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TurnOnGreen has higher upside potential than Preformed Line Products, analysts believe TurnOnGreen is more attractive than Preformed Line Products.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.763% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Preformed Line Products has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.513%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Preformed Line Products offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products pays out 10.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Preformed Line Products quarterly revenues of $167.1M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is lower than Preformed Line Products's net income of $10.5M. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Preformed Line Products's PE ratio is 19.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.28x versus 1.21x for Preformed Line Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of -697.46%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.61%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than TurnOnGreen, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than TurnOnGreen.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.763% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.981, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.137%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.28x versus 2.07x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of 0.72%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 153.85%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than TurnOnGreen, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than TurnOnGreen.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.763% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.823%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is lower than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 10.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.28x versus 0.56x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.