SJMHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of --. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group's return on equity of 16.73%.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SJM Holdings has higher upside potential than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group, analysts believe SJM Holdings is more attractive than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group has a beta of 0.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.031%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group pays out 192.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group quarterly revenues of --. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group's net income of --. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,541.33x while Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group's PE ratio is 19.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.01x versus 1.11x for Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NFT has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of --. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat NFT's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SJM Holdings has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe SJM Holdings is more attractive than NFT.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 262.668%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,541.33x while NFT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.01x versus 0.49x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of -1.7%. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 34.47%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.6%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of -$20.3M. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,541.33x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 52.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.01x versus 0.48x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Studio City International Holdings has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of -18.15%. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29%.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 274.15%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.172, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.191%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Studio City International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues of $152.9M. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,541.33x while Studio City International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.01x versus 0.89x for Studio City International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.