PSTNY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airbus SE has a net margin of 5.02% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of 9.81%. PostNL NV's return on equity of 8.01% beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.99%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Airbus SE.

PostNL NV has a beta of -0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 132.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.173%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. PostNL NV pays 129.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 52.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PostNL NV's is not.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $997.7M, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $26.3B. PostNL NV's net income of $50.1M is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $2.6B. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 27.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.18x versus 1.65x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of 5.02% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of 8.01% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of 5.54%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of -0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 132.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.563%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PostNL NV pays 129.41% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $997.7M, which are larger than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. PostNL NV's net income of $50.1M is higher than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.18x versus 0.34x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Randstad NV has a net margin of 5.02% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of -2.45%. PostNL NV's return on equity of 8.01% beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 2.99%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Randstad NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of -0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 132.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.976%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. PostNL NV pays 129.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 516.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $997.7M, which are smaller than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6.5B. PostNL NV's net income of $50.1M is higher than Randstad NV's net income of -$158.8M. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 52.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.18x versus 0.26x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of 5.02% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of 8.01% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 63.81%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of -0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 132.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.333%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. PostNL NV pays 129.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 48.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PostNL NV's is not.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $997.7M, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. PostNL NV's net income of $50.1M is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 35.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.18x versus 6.49x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.