EVOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of -1695.38% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 4.02%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -47.34% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $193.71 which suggests that it could grow by 13.22%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.666%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.1K, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $6.9B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 21.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,964.84x versus 1.15x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of -1695.38% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 9.24%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -47.34% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $500.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.884%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.1K, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 26.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,964.84x versus 2.14x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Controls International PLC has a net margin of -1695.38% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 8.42%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -47.34% beat Johnson Controls International PLC's return on equity of 14.65%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Johnson Controls International PLC has an analysts' consensus of $95.06 which suggests that it could grow by 4.19%. Given that Johnson Controls International PLC has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Controls International PLC is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Controls International PLC has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.351%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Johnson Controls International PLC offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Controls International PLC pays out 58.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Controls International PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.1K, which are smaller than Johnson Controls International PLC quarterly revenues of $5.7B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Johnson Controls International PLC's net income of $478M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Johnson Controls International PLC's PE ratio is 24.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,964.84x versus 2.86x for Johnson Controls International PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of -1695.38% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 10.61%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -47.34% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $164.25 which suggests that it could grow by 9.97%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.045%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.1K, which are smaller than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $482.6M. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 34.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,964.84x versus 3.52x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.