Is Okta a Good Stock to Buy?
Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA) is used by some of the largest firms…
Sell
43
EMSHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$771.86
Seasonality move
:
2.85%
Day range:
$771.86 - $771.86
52-week range:
$681.11 - $855.98
Dividend yield:
1.91%
P/E ratio:
34.96x
P/S ratio:
7.77x
P/B ratio:
8.89x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2
1-year change:
8.94%
Market cap:
$18.1B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$22.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
$771.86 | -- | $18.1B | 34.96x | $18.49 | 1.91% | 7.77x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$6.56 | -- | $4.9B | 36.32x | $0.04 | 1.33% | 7.24x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$9.48 | -- | $3.1B | 11.47x | $0.47 | 4.96% | 0.67x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$88.66 | -- | $40.9B | 33.62x | $1.58 | 1.79% | 4.94x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
$19.58 | -- | $53.9B | 16.67x | $0.62 | 3.16% | 1.85x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$22.30 | -- | $35.8B | 25.58x | $0.41 | 1.83% | 2.71x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -0.251 | -- | 2.39x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 0.212 | -- | 1.33x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
42.02% | -0.867 | 47.74% | 1.01x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
48.6% | 0.562 | 11.92% | 0.88x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
32.18% | 0.863 | 26.71% | 0.90x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
42.98% | 0.705 | 15.49% | 1.23x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 8.92% | 8.92% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 6.19% | 10.24% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 12.12% | 25.06% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | 8.04% | 10.63% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 10.24% | 19.07% | -- | -- |
Ems-Chemie Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or BCHMY?
Bachem Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bachem Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Bachem Holding AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Bachem Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or BCHMY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Bachem Holding AG offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG pays out 49.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Bachem Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Bachem Holding AG's PE ratio is 36.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.77x versus 7.24x for Bachem Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.77x 34.96x -- -- BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.24x 36.32x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.6B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or CLZNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.145%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 4.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.77x versus 0.67x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.77x 34.96x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.67x 11.47x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $9.9B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or GVDNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.08%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 57.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 33.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.77x versus 4.94x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.77x 34.96x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA4.94x 33.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or HCMLY?
Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B HCMLYHolcim-- -- $45.2B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or HCMLY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.169%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Holcim offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 53.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Holcim's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.77x versus 1.85x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.77x 34.96x -- -- HCMLYHolcim1.85x 16.67x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $13.7B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or SXYAY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.839%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 25.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.77x versus 2.71x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.77x 34.96x -- -- SXYAYSika AG2.71x 25.58x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Fidelity High Dividend ETF a Good Investment Now?
Fidelity’s High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is a fund that offers…
Is Kinder Morgan Dividend Yield Worth It?
Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) is a major energy infrastructure company in…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 5
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 32.59% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 5
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 27.33% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 5
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is up 23.96% over the past day.
