DLICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 3.08%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 11.6% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.4%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.86 which suggests that it could grow by 8.11%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.756%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 37.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is higher than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $197.1M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.63x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.45x versus 2.74x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 7.08%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 11.6% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.7%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $13.74 which suggests that it could grow by 1.47%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.621%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 37.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 28.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $10.6B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is higher than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $747.7M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.63x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.45x versus 3.52x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 17.65%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 11.6% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.16 which suggests that it could grow by 20.52%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.284%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 37.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.63x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 8.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.45x versus 1.62x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.