Where Will Nu Holdings Stock Be in 2030?
Despite fast growth, high profitability and an extraordinary runway ahead,…
Buy
65
CICOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.60
Seasonality move
:
7.5%
Day range:
$1.60 - $1.60
52-week range:
$1.02 - $1.89
Dividend yield:
11.05%
P/E ratio:
4.43x
P/S ratio:
1.00x
P/B ratio:
0.79x
Volume:
102
Avg. volume:
209
1-year change:
56.25%
Market cap:
$25B
Revenue:
$32.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$52.2M | -- | -11.32% | -- | $2.00 |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$20.9M | -$0.03 | 142.04% | -83.04% | $28.11 |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
$1.60 | -- | $25B | 4.43x | $0.07 | 11.05% | 1.00x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$0.84 | -- | $5.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.99x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$0.76 | $2.00 | $68.4M | 5.84x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.39x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$19.84 | $28.11 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 20.97x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
$6.95 | -- | $32.3M | 1.52x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
14.48% | 0.293 | -- | 1.54x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
13.06% | -1.741 | 96.59% | 7.40x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
17.84% | 1.027 | 33.33% | 0.33x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
9.06% | -0.544 | 1.3% | 2.51x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
1.33% | -0.790 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
$4.3B | $3.8B | 13.77% | 9.68% | 40.47% | -$3.7B |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$82.8K | -$381.1K | -7.41% | -8.7% | -90.4% | $235.3K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$3.3M | -$6.1M | 7.67% | 9.64% | -24.12% | $3.9M |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$13.9M | -$7.7M | -34.15% | -41.52% | -26.83% | -- |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or ATXG?
Addentax Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -102.49%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat Addentax Group's return on equity of -8.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B ATXGAddentax Group7.82% -$0.19 $27.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has higher upside potential than Addentax Group, analysts believe COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is more attractive than Addentax Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or ATXG More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.05%. Addentax Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than Addentax Group quarterly revenues of $1.1M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than Addentax Group's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while Addentax Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 1.00x versus 0.99x for Addentax Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings1.00x 4.43x $10.3B $3B ATXGAddentax Group0.99x -- $1.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -17.77%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B CBATCBAK Energy Technology13.05% -$0.05 $146.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 163.16%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or CBAT More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.589, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.935%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.05%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $25.4M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 5.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 1.00x versus 0.39x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings1.00x 4.43x $10.3B $3B CBATCBAK Energy Technology0.39x 5.84x $25.4M -$4.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or EH?
EHang Holdings has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -28.52%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -41.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B EHEHang Holdings60.68% -$0.09 $144M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $28.11 which suggests that it could grow by 41.69%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 EHEHang Holdings7 1 0 -
Is CICOF or EH More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.015%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.05%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $22.8M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.5M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 1.00x versus 20.97x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings1.00x 4.43x $10.3B $3B EHEHang Holdings20.97x -- $22.8M -$6.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or NISN?
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1209.35%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or NISN More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.156%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.05%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 1.00x versus 0.11x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings1.00x 4.43x $10.3B $3B NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0.11x 1.52x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is it Too Late to Buy United Airlines Stock?
United Airlines (NASDAQ:UAL) has thoroughly outpaced the broader stock market…
3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
When the market entered a correction in February and March,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
78
GATE alert for Apr 2
Marblegate Acquisition [GATE] is up 86.64% over the past day.
Buy
52
NUTX alert for Apr 2
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 5.41% over the past day.
Buy
75
CORT alert for Apr 2
Corcept Therapeutics [CORT] is down 8.84% over the past day.
