Is Okta a Good Stock to Buy?
Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA) is used by some of the largest firms…
Sell
18
CHFHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.70
Seasonality move
:
2.56%
Day range:
$6.70 - $6.70
52-week range:
$6.25 - $7.65
Dividend yield:
6.06%
P/E ratio:
7.83x
P/S ratio:
0.31x
P/B ratio:
1.06x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-7.2%
Market cap:
$937.1M
Revenue:
$3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.86
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFHY
China Foods
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDWBY
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
|
$1.5B | -- | -26.36% | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMGLF
San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFHY
China Foods
|
$6.70 | -- | $937.1M | 7.83x | $0.41 | 6.06% | 0.31x |
|
BDWBY
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
|
$4.58 | -- | $15.1B | 20.99x | $0.21 | 4.61% | 2.44x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
|
$7.20 | -- | $11.7B | 17.74x | $0.10 | 2.82% | 2.17x |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding
|
$1.85 | -- | $32.6M | 33.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.25x |
|
SMGLF
San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong
|
$0.17 | -- | $63.5M | 6.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.70x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
|
$0.15 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.40x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFHY
China Foods
|
-- | -0.086 | -- | 0.83x |
|
BDWBY
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
|
1.96% | -0.843 | 1.54% | 0.86x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
|
6.35% | -1.081 | 2.56% | 0.22x |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 1.89x |
|
SMGLF
San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong
|
0.53% | 0.000 | 0.74% | 3.13x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFHY
China Foods
|
-- | -- | 8.61% | 8.61% | -- | -- |
|
BDWBY
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC
|
$875M | $315M | 6.78% | 6.93% | 18.48% | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings)
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
SMGLF
San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong
|
-- | -- | -3.04% | -3.06% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China Foods vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or BDWBY?
Budweiser Brewing Co APAC has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of 11.79%. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's return on equity of 6.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFHYChina Foods-- -- $1.4B BDWBYBudweiser Brewing Co APAC51.32% $0.06 $10.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or BDWBY?
China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Budweiser Brewing Co APAC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFHYChina Foods0 0 0 BDWBYBudweiser Brewing Co APAC0 0 0 -
Is CHFHY or BDWBY More Risky?
China Foods has a beta of 0.275, which suggesting that the stock is 72.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Budweiser Brewing Co APAC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or BDWBY?
China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Budweiser Brewing Co APAC offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. China Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Budweiser Brewing Co APAC pays out 96.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or BDWBY?
China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC quarterly revenues of $1.7B. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's net income of $201M. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while Budweiser Brewing Co APAC's PE ratio is 20.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 2.44x for Budweiser Brewing Co APAC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFHYChina Foods0.31x 7.83x -- -- BDWBYBudweiser Brewing Co APAC2.44x 20.99x $1.7B $201M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or CRHKY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings)'s return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFHYChina Foods-- -- $1.4B CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings)-- -- $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or CRHKY?
China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings), analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFHYChina Foods0 0 0 CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings)0 0 0 -
Is CHFHY or CRHKY More Risky?
China Foods has a beta of 0.275, which suggesting that the stock is 72.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) has a beta of 0.125, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.453%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or CRHKY?
China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. China Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or CRHKY?
China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while China Resources Beer (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 17.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 2.17x for China Resources Beer (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFHYChina Foods0.31x 7.83x -- -- CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings)2.17x 17.74x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or RAY?
Raytech Holding has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat Raytech Holding's return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFHYChina Foods-- -- $1.4B RAYRaytech Holding-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or RAY?
China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than Raytech Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFHYChina Foods0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding0 0 0 -
Is CHFHY or RAY More Risky?
China Foods has a beta of 0.275, which suggesting that the stock is 72.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or RAY?
China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Raytech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or RAY?
China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding's net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while Raytech Holding's PE ratio is 33.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 3.25x for Raytech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFHYChina Foods0.31x 7.83x -- -- RAYRaytech Holding3.25x 33.32x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or SMGLF?
San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong's return on equity of -3.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFHYChina Foods-- -- $1.4B SMGLFSan Miguel Brewery Hong Kong-- -- $82.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or SMGLF?
China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFHYChina Foods0 0 0 SMGLFSan Miguel Brewery Hong Kong0 0 0 -
Is CHFHY or SMGLF More Risky?
China Foods has a beta of 0.275, which suggesting that the stock is 72.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or SMGLF?
China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or SMGLF?
China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong's net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong's PE ratio is 6.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 0.70x for San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFHYChina Foods0.31x 7.83x -- -- SMGLFSan Miguel Brewery Hong Kong0.70x 6.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFHY or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding has a net margin of -- compared to China Foods's net margin of --. China Foods's return on equity of 8.61% beat Top Wealth Group Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFHYChina Foods-- -- $1.4B TWGTop Wealth Group Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHFHY or TWG?
China Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Foods has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding, analysts believe China Foods is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFHYChina Foods0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding0 0 0 -
Is CHFHY or TWG More Risky?
China Foods has a beta of 0.275, which suggesting that the stock is 72.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFHY or TWG?
China Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Top Wealth Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFHY or TWG?
China Foods quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. China Foods's net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, China Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.83x while Top Wealth Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Foods is 0.31x versus 0.40x for Top Wealth Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFHYChina Foods0.31x 7.83x -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding0.40x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Fidelity High Dividend ETF a Good Investment Now?
Fidelity’s High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is a fund that offers…
Is Kinder Morgan Dividend Yield Worth It?
Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) is a major energy infrastructure company in…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 5
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 32.59% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 5
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 27.33% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 5
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is up 23.96% over the past day.
