BLHEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GAM Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Baloise Holding AG's net margin of --. Baloise Holding AG's return on equity of 10.93% beat GAM Holding AG's return on equity of -82.07%.

Baloise Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GAM Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baloise Holding AG has higher upside potential than GAM Holding AG, analysts believe Baloise Holding AG is more attractive than GAM Holding AG.

Baloise Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GAM Holding AG has a beta of 1.327, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.705%.

Baloise Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. GAM Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baloise Holding AG pays 90.72% of its earnings as a dividend. GAM Holding AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baloise Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baloise Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GAM Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Baloise Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than GAM Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Baloise Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while GAM Holding AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baloise Holding AG is 1.32x versus 0.03x for GAM Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Julius Baer Gruppe AG has a net margin of -- compared to Baloise Holding AG's net margin of --. Baloise Holding AG's return on equity of 10.93% beat Julius Baer Gruppe AG's return on equity of 15.84%.

Baloise Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Julius Baer Gruppe AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baloise Holding AG has higher upside potential than Julius Baer Gruppe AG, analysts believe Baloise Holding AG is more attractive than Julius Baer Gruppe AG.

Baloise Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Julius Baer Gruppe AG has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.766%.

Baloise Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Julius Baer Gruppe AG offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Baloise Holding AG pays 90.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Julius Baer Gruppe AG pays out 52.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baloise Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Julius Baer Gruppe AG quarterly revenues of --. Baloise Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Julius Baer Gruppe AG's net income of --. Notably, Baloise Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while Julius Baer Gruppe AG's PE ratio is 10.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baloise Holding AG is 1.32x versus 2.83x for Julius Baer Gruppe AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UBS Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to Baloise Holding AG's net margin of 6.96%. Baloise Holding AG's return on equity of 10.93% beat UBS Group AG's return on equity of 5.92%.

Baloise Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UBS Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $31.60 which suggests that it could grow by 13.1%. Given that UBS Group AG has higher upside potential than Baloise Holding AG, analysts believe UBS Group AG is more attractive than Baloise Holding AG.

Baloise Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UBS Group AG has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.544%.

Baloise Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. UBS Group AG offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Baloise Holding AG pays 90.72% of its earnings as a dividend. UBS Group AG pays out 44.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baloise Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UBS Group AG quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Baloise Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than UBS Group AG's net income of $770M. Notably, Baloise Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while UBS Group AG's PE ratio is 18.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baloise Holding AG is 1.32x versus 2.02x for UBS Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurich Insurance Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to Baloise Holding AG's net margin of --. Baloise Holding AG's return on equity of 10.93% beat Zurich Insurance Group AG's return on equity of 22.14%.

Baloise Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zurich Insurance Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $33.97 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Zurich Insurance Group AG has higher upside potential than Baloise Holding AG, analysts believe Zurich Insurance Group AG is more attractive than Baloise Holding AG.

Baloise Holding AG has a beta of 0.088, which suggesting that the stock is 91.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurich Insurance Group AG has a beta of 0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.673%.

Baloise Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Zurich Insurance Group AG offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.59 per share. Baloise Holding AG pays 90.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurich Insurance Group AG pays out 76.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baloise Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zurich Insurance Group AG quarterly revenues of --. Baloise Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Zurich Insurance Group AG's net income of --. Notably, Baloise Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while Zurich Insurance Group AG's PE ratio is 17.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baloise Holding AG is 1.32x versus 1.28x for Zurich Insurance Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.