Financhill
Sell
31

AUMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.18
Seasonality move :
5.98%
Day range:
$0.14 - $0.19
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.54
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.22x
P/B ratio:
11.10x
Volume:
63.7K
Avg. volume:
44.5K
1-year change:
-68.07%
Market cap:
$2.3M
Revenue:
$12M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.29

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AUMN
Golden Minerals
-- -- -- -- --
CENX
Century Aluminum
$527M $0.59 8.08% -73.89% $22.67
DYNR
DynaResource
-- -- -- -- --
FRD
Friedman Industries
-- -- -- -- --
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- -$0.02 -- -33.33% $1.40
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- -$0.01 -- -100% $1.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AUMN
Golden Minerals
$0.15 -- $2.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.22x
CENX
Century Aluminum
$16.36 $22.67 $1.5B 14.10x $0.00 0% 0.67x
DYNR
DynaResource
$1.25 -- $36.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.68x
FRD
Friedman Industries
$15.76 -- $109.9M 19.46x $0.04 1.02% 0.24x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
$0.51 $1.40 $36.7M -- $0.00 0% --
XPL
Solitario Resources
$0.62 $1.50 $50.9M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AUMN
Golden Minerals
-- -7.498 -- 1.19x
CENX
Century Aluminum
39.92% 1.881 28.46% 0.54x
DYNR
DynaResource
51.69% 0.817 30.44% 0.22x
FRD
Friedman Industries
20.34% 0.073 30.78% 0.78x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- 0.695 -- --
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- 0.703 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AUMN
Golden Minerals
-$7K -$860K -193.83% -193.83% -1049.67% $354K
CENX
Century Aluminum
$60.6M $46.1M 10.58% 18.99% 6.17% $51.1M
DYNR
DynaResource
$6.2M $1.8M -16.61% -45.45% 13.84% -$832.8K
FRD
Friedman Industries
$8.1M -$1.6M 3.41% 4.48% -0.98% $1.6M
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-$185.4K -$2.2M -- -- -- -$1.6M
XPL
Solitario Resources
-$7K -$736K -- -- -- -$598K

Golden Minerals vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AUMN or CENX?

    Century Aluminum has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of 4.69%. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -193.83% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    -430% -$0.08 $5.1M
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    9.56% $0.29 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About AUMN or CENX?

    Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 874.03%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 38.55%. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0 0 0
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    2 0 0
  • Is AUMN or CENX More Risky?

    Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 158.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or CENX?

    Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or CENX?

    Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are $300K, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Golden Minerals's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.22x versus 0.67x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0.22x -- $300K -$1.2M
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    0.67x 14.10x $633.9M $29.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUMN or DYNR?

    DynaResource has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of 4.39%. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -193.83% beat DynaResource's return on equity of -45.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    -430% -$0.08 $5.1M
    DYNR
    DynaResource
    45.33% $0.02 $20.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUMN or DYNR?

    Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 874.03%. On the other hand DynaResource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than DynaResource.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0 0 0
    DYNR
    DynaResource
    0 0 0
  • Is AUMN or DYNR More Risky?

    Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 158.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource has a beta of 0.412, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.764%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or DYNR?

    Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DynaResource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or DYNR?

    Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are $300K, which are smaller than DynaResource quarterly revenues of $13.7M. Golden Minerals's net income of -$1.2M is lower than DynaResource's net income of $601.4K. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DynaResource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.22x versus 0.68x for DynaResource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0.22x -- $300K -$1.2M
    DYNR
    DynaResource
    0.68x -- $13.7M $601.4K
  • Which has Higher Returns AUMN or FRD?

    Friedman Industries has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of -1.23%. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -193.83% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    -430% -$0.08 $5.1M
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    8.6% -$0.17 $159.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUMN or FRD?

    Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 874.03%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0 0 0
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is AUMN or FRD More Risky?

    Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 158.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.38%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or FRD?

    Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or FRD?

    Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are $300K, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Golden Minerals's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.22x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0.22x -- $300K -$1.2M
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0.24x 19.46x $94.1M -$1.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUMN or PZG?

    Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of --. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -193.83% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    -430% -$0.08 $5.1M
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -$0.04 --
  • What do Analysts Say About AUMN or PZG?

    Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 874.03%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 172.37%. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0 0 0
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    1 0 0
  • Is AUMN or PZG More Risky?

    Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 158.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or PZG?

    Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or PZG?

    Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are $300K, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.22x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0.22x -- $300K -$1.2M
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -- -- -$2.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUMN or XPL?

    Solitario Resources has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals's net margin of --. Golden Minerals's return on equity of -193.83% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    -430% -$0.08 $5.1M
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -$0.01 --
  • What do Analysts Say About AUMN or XPL?

    Golden Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 874.03%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 143.7%. Given that Golden Minerals has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources, analysts believe Golden Minerals is more attractive than Solitario Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0 0 0
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is AUMN or XPL More Risky?

    Golden Minerals has a beta of -0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 158.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or XPL?

    Golden Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or XPL?

    Golden Minerals quarterly revenues are $300K, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Golden Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals is 0.22x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUMN
    Golden Minerals
    0.22x -- $300K -$1.2M
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -- -- -$511K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?
Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?

Shares of EV major Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) have experienced extreme volatility…

Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?

For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…

Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?

You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28

Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is up 1.57% over the past day.

Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28

ATS [ATS] is down 1.27% over the past day.

Buy
88
SMR alert for May 28

NuScale Power [SMR] is down 0.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock