Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?
JPMorgan Chase is rolling out “JPM WealthAI for high-net-worth clients.…
Sell
24
AMKBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.43
Seasonality move
:
2.41%
Day range:
$7.43 - $7.71
52-week range:
$6.60 - $9.76
Dividend yield:
15.42%
P/E ratio:
3.84x
P/S ratio:
0.42x
P/B ratio:
0.41x
Volume:
951.3K
Avg. volume:
223.6K
1-year change:
7.22%
Market cap:
$23.2B
Revenue:
$55.5B
EPS (TTM):
$1.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
$12.5B | $0.41 | 2.67% | 645.44% | $8.30 |
|
DAC
Danaos
|
$250M | $7.09 | -4.52% | -14.65% | $97.00 |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
$4.7M | -$0.16 | 4.79% | -55.56% | $3.40 |
|
SVZRF
Svitzer Group AS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
$1.8B | $1.43 | 17.8% | 130.67% | $14.90 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
$7.43 | $8.30 | $23.2B | 3.84x | $0.81 | 15.42% | 0.42x |
|
DAC
Danaos
|
$73.45 | $97.00 | $1.4B | 2.83x | $0.85 | 4.49% | 1.41x |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
$73.00 | -- | $25.7B | 9.93x | $4.97 | 6.81% | 1.24x |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
$1.70 | $3.40 | $16.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.73x |
|
SVZRF
Svitzer Group AS
|
$38.41 | -- | $1.2B | 22.44x | $1.17 | 0% | 1.34x |
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
$13.79 | $14.90 | $1.7B | 0.77x | $3.17 | 51.78% | 0.20x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
8.17% | -0.289 | 18.88% | 2.29x |
|
DAC
Danaos
|
17.67% | 0.476 | 48.33% | 3.59x |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
12.13% | -0.844 | 10.82% | 1.45x |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
31.04% | 1.012 | 34.41% | 1.57x |
|
SVZRF
Svitzer Group AS
|
35.55% | 0.000 | 51.44% | 1.21x |
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
2.26% | 0.995 | 3.6% | 1.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
-- | -- | 10.12% | 11.07% | 15.45% | $2.8B |
|
DAC
Danaos
|
$158.1M | $127.1M | 13.23% | 15.54% | 38.88% | $78.5M |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
$1.2B | $798.1M | 10.85% | 12.44% | 22.56% | $845.8M |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
-$209.5K | -$2.6M | -53.31% | -70.55% | -107.3% | -$2.1M |
|
SVZRF
Svitzer Group AS
|
-- | -- | 3.28% | 5.59% | -- | -- |
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
$731M | $615.3M | 65.38% | 67.67% | 33.31% | $1.1B |
A P Moller Maersk AS vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AMKBY or DAC?
Danaos has a net margin of 14.29% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of 35.03%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 11.07% beat Danaos's return on equity of 15.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS-- $0.66 $63B DACDanaos61.22% $4.74 $4.2B -
What do Analysts Say About AMKBY or DAC?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $8.30, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Danaos has an analysts' consensus of $97.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.06%. Given that Danaos has higher upside potential than A P Moller Maersk AS, analysts believe Danaos is more attractive than A P Moller Maersk AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0 1 0 DACDanaos1 1 0 -
Is AMKBY or DAC More Risky?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danaos has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.117%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMKBY or DAC?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.42%. Danaos offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Danaos pays out 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMKBY or DAC?
A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than Danaos quarterly revenues of $258.2M. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $2.1B is higher than Danaos's net income of $90.4M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.84x while Danaos's PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.42x versus 1.41x for Danaos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0.42x 3.84x $14.6B $2.1B DACDanaos1.41x 2.83x $258.2M $90.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMKBY or HPGLY?
Hapag-Lloyd AG has a net margin of 14.29% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of 14.01%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 11.07% beat Hapag-Lloyd AG's return on equity of 12.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS-- $0.66 $63B HPGLYHapag-Lloyd AG22.3% $2.14 $24.5B -
What do Analysts Say About AMKBY or HPGLY?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $8.30, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Hapag-Lloyd AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than Hapag-Lloyd AG, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than Hapag-Lloyd AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0 1 0 HPGLYHapag-Lloyd AG0 0 0 -
Is AMKBY or HPGLY More Risky?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hapag-Lloyd AG has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.078%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMKBY or HPGLY?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.42%. Hapag-Lloyd AG offers a yield of 6.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.97 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Hapag-Lloyd AG pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMKBY or HPGLY?
A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than Hapag-Lloyd AG quarterly revenues of $5.4B. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $2.1B is higher than Hapag-Lloyd AG's net income of $754.4M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.84x while Hapag-Lloyd AG's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.42x versus 1.24x for Hapag-Lloyd AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0.42x 3.84x $14.6B $2.1B HPGLYHapag-Lloyd AG1.24x 9.93x $5.4B $754.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMKBY or LIQT?
LiqTech International has a net margin of 14.29% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of -114.62%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 11.07% beat LiqTech International's return on equity of -70.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS-- $0.66 $63B LIQTLiqTech International-8.46% -$0.49 $16.6M -
What do Analysts Say About AMKBY or LIQT?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $8.30, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand LiqTech International has an analysts' consensus of $3.40 which suggests that it could grow by 100%. Given that LiqTech International has higher upside potential than A P Moller Maersk AS, analysts believe LiqTech International is more attractive than A P Moller Maersk AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0 1 0 LIQTLiqTech International1 0 0 -
Is AMKBY or LIQT More Risky?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiqTech International has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.12%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMKBY or LIQT?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.42%. LiqTech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. LiqTech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A P Moller Maersk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMKBY or LIQT?
A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than LiqTech International quarterly revenues of $2.5M. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $2.1B is higher than LiqTech International's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.84x while LiqTech International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.42x versus 0.73x for LiqTech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0.42x 3.84x $14.6B $2.1B LIQTLiqTech International0.73x -- $2.5M -$2.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMKBY or SVZRF?
Svitzer Group AS has a net margin of 14.29% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of --. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 11.07% beat Svitzer Group AS's return on equity of 5.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS-- $0.66 $63B SVZRFSvitzer Group AS-- -- $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About AMKBY or SVZRF?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $8.30, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Svitzer Group AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than Svitzer Group AS, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than Svitzer Group AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0 1 0 SVZRFSvitzer Group AS0 0 0 -
Is AMKBY or SVZRF More Risky?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Svitzer Group AS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMKBY or SVZRF?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.42%. Svitzer Group AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Svitzer Group AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A P Moller Maersk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMKBY or SVZRF?
A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than Svitzer Group AS quarterly revenues of --. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $2.1B is higher than Svitzer Group AS's net income of --. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.84x while Svitzer Group AS's PE ratio is 22.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.42x versus 1.34x for Svitzer Group AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0.42x 3.84x $14.6B $2.1B SVZRFSvitzer Group AS1.34x 22.44x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMKBY or ZIM?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a net margin of 14.29% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of 25.9%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 11.07% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 67.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS-- $0.66 $63B ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services33.72% $4.66 $4.1B -
What do Analysts Say About AMKBY or ZIM?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $8.30, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has an analysts' consensus of $14.90 which suggests that it could grow by 8.02%. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0 1 0 ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0 2 2 -
Is AMKBY or ZIM More Risky?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMKBY or ZIM?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.42%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services offers a yield of 51.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMKBY or ZIM?
A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $14.6B, which are larger than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues of $2.2B. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $2.1B is higher than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $561.5M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.84x while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.42x versus 0.20x for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0.42x 3.84x $14.6B $2.1B ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.20x 0.77x $2.2B $561.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
While already interesting as the world moves toward greener energy…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
