5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Buy
75
ROM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$57.22
Seasonality move
:
10.18%
Day range:
$54.24 - $56.43
52-week range:
$36.68 - $77.46
Dividend yield:
0.27%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
60.1K
Avg. volume:
102.1K
1-year change:
-3.03%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
$56.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.27% | -- |
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
$106.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
$91.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.27% | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
$13.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 2.64% | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
$57.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.72% | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
$43.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.27% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
-- | 2.267 | -- | -- |
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | 3.815 | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | 2.195 | -- | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | 3.317 | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | 3.353 | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | 2.648 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Ultra Technology vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ROM or BULZ?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra Technology's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's return on equity of -- beat MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROM or BULZ?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra Technology has higher upside potential than MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN, analysts believe ProShares Ultra Technology is more attractive than MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMProShares Ultra Technology0 0 0 BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 -
Is ROM or BULZ More Risky?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a beta of 2.419, which suggesting that the stock is 141.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROM or BULZ?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Ultra Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROM or BULZ?
ProShares Ultra Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's net income of -- is lower than MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra Technology is -- versus -- for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- -- BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROM or QLD?
ProShares Ultra QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra Technology's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROM or QLD?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra Technology has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra QQQ, analysts believe ProShares Ultra Technology is more attractive than ProShares Ultra QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMProShares Ultra Technology0 0 0 QLDProShares Ultra QQQ0 0 0 -
Is ROM or QLD More Risky?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a beta of 2.419, which suggesting that the stock is 141.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra QQQ has a beta of 2.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 134.941%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROM or QLD?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. ProShares Ultra QQQ offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ProShares Ultra Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROM or QLD?
ProShares Ultra Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra QQQ quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra QQQ's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra Technology is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROM or SOXL?
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra Technology's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- SOXLDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROM or SOXL?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra Technology has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares, analysts believe ProShares Ultra Technology is more attractive than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMProShares Ultra Technology0 0 0 SOXLDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares0 0 0 -
Is ROM or SOXL More Risky?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a beta of 2.419, which suggesting that the stock is 141.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares has a beta of 4.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 324.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROM or SOXL?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. ProShares Ultra Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROM or SOXL?
ProShares Ultra Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra Technology is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- -- SOXLDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROM or TQQQ?
ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra Technology's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraPro QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROM or TQQQ?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraPro QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra Technology has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraPro QQQ, analysts believe ProShares Ultra Technology is more attractive than ProShares UltraPro QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMProShares Ultra Technology0 0 0 TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ0 0 0 -
Is ROM or TQQQ More Risky?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a beta of 2.419, which suggesting that the stock is 141.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a beta of 3.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 252.185%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROM or TQQQ?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. ProShares UltraPro QQQ offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ProShares Ultra Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraPro QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROM or TQQQ?
ProShares Ultra Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraPro QQQ quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraPro QQQ's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraPro QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra Technology is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraPro QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROM or USD?
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra Technology's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROM or USD?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra Technology has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors, analysts believe ProShares Ultra Technology is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMProShares Ultra Technology0 0 0 USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors0 0 0 -
Is ROM or USD More Risky?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a beta of 2.419, which suggesting that the stock is 141.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has a beta of 2.999, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.858%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROM or USD?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ProShares Ultra Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROM or USD?
ProShares Ultra Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra Technology's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra Technology is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- -- USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.
Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8
Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.
Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8
LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.33% over the past day.
