Why Did Buffett Sell So Much Last Year?
In 2024, value investing legend Warren Buffett did the seemingly…
Sell
41
EWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.75
Seasonality move
:
0.84%
Day range:
$15.83 - $15.98
52-week range:
$14.64 - $20.37
Dividend yield:
4.39%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
2.4M
1-year change:
-3.12%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$15.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 4.39% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$19.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 5.4% | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
$16.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 4.66% | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
$46.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 1.92% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$28.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.87% | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
$19.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.49% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.286 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.886 | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.278 | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | 0.589 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.187 | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | 1.347 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or FCA?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is EWH or FCA More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.237%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or FCA?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or FCA?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or FLHK?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or FLHK?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or FLHK More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.69%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or FLHK?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or FLHK?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or FLTW?
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or FLTW?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or FLTW More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.405%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or FLTW?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or FLTW?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or FXI?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or FXI More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.755%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or FXI?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or FXI?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or KALL?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or KALL More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or KALL?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or KALL?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Tower Stock Undervalued?
The market action of late has been nothing short of…
Is Broadcom Stock Overvalued?
The semiconductor company Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is having a stellar…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x
Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 13
Constellation Energy [CEG] is down 6.43% over the past day.
Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 13
Mercury General [MCY] is down 7.46% over the past day.
Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 13
Aritzia [ATZAF] is down 5.3% over the past day.
