CGBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's return on equity of -- beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity of --.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has higher upside potential than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund, analysts believe Capital Group Core Balanced ETF is more attractive than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.507%.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's net income of -- is lower than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF is -- versus -- for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund's return on equity of --.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund, analysts believe Capital Group Core Balanced ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.332%.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ClearShares OCIO ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's return on equity of -- beat ClearShares OCIO ETF's return on equity of --.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearShares OCIO ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has higher upside potential than ClearShares OCIO ETF, analysts believe Capital Group Core Balanced ETF is more attractive than ClearShares OCIO ETF.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearShares OCIO ETF has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.436%.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. ClearShares OCIO ETF offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearShares OCIO ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearShares OCIO ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's net income of -- is lower than ClearShares OCIO ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Core Balanced ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearShares OCIO ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF is -- versus -- for ClearShares OCIO ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.