ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 38.84%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 229.75%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.72%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $453.14 which suggests that it could grow by 27.9%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than AppLovin, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than AppLovin.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $576.4M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AppLovin's PE ratio is 63.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 23.93x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flywire has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -3.12%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat Flywire's return on equity of 0.61%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.72%. On the other hand Flywire has an analysts' consensus of $13.63 which suggests that it could grow by 25.69%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Flywire, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Flywire.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flywire has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flywire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flywire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are larger than Flywire quarterly revenues of $133.5M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than Flywire's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flywire's PE ratio is 367.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 2.73x for Flywire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -3.05%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.72%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $752.81 which suggests that it could grow by 22.43%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.528%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $714.1M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is higher than HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,700.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 11.80x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.69%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.72%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $33.38 which suggests that it could grow by 28.71%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.611%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $612.1M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 0.98x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.