ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flywire has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -3.12%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat Flywire's return on equity of 0.61%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.42%. On the other hand Flywire has an analysts' consensus of $14.17 which suggests that it could grow by 29.97%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Flywire, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Flywire.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flywire has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flywire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flywire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are larger than Flywire quarterly revenues of $133.5M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than Flywire's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flywire's PE ratio is 363.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 2.70x for Flywire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 0.71%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.42%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $750.28 which suggests that it could grow by 16.55%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.528%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $703.2M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than HubSpot's net income of $5M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 7,152.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 12.77x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.17%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.42%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $34.53 which suggests that it could grow by 34.04%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.611%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $614.5M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than RingCentral's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 0.99x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.23%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.42%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.26%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than WidePoint.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.39x versus 0.32x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.